Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 149D93800008A; Thu, 23 May 2013 08:18:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UfUSA-0001Bj-DN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:17:06 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.34] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UfUSA-0001Ba-1R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:17:06 +0100 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UfUS8-0003rg-57 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:17:04 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApgBAHcGnlECZMlf/2dsb2JhbAANTY9OsyWCcIEggxcBAQEBAzIBBVELCQ8JFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAa9nkmOPJBaDPgOXOJJygV4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,728,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="576252781" Received: from host-2-100-201-95.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.201.95]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 23 May 2013 13:11:30 +0100 Message-ID: <519E0774.7070002@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:11:32 +0100 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <519DEEFD.7030906@psk31.plus.com> <519DFDCA.5050904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <519DFDCA.5050904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130522-1, 22/05/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay2.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 23/05/2013 12:30, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > What is the ERP you're getting from your 200mW signal? Hi Stefan Well Mal hasn't sent his antennas down to the Midlands for me yet, so no improvements on the ERP, so 100uW or so. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 6aac716dc074d63ee3780b79bbe46b5d Subject: Re: LF: 474.2KHz WSPR Test 200mW RF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc149519e09000d53 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none On 23/05/2013 12:30, Stefan Schäfer wrote: > What is the ERP you're getting from your 200mW signal? Hi Stefan Well Mal hasn't sent his antennas down to the Midlands for me yet, so no improvements on the ERP, so 100uW or so. Hope all is well with you. 73 Eddie