Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9995B3800009A; Thu, 23 May 2013 07:32:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UfTjL-0000yn-27 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:30:47 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UfTjK-0000ye-MO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:30:46 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UfTjJ-0002RV-4d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 12:30:45 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r4NBUNn0024645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:30:24 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r4NBULdo021444 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:30:21 +0200 Message-ID: <519DFDCA.5050904@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:30:18 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <519DEEFD.7030906@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <519DEEFD.7030906@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Eddie, I'm monitoring WSPR on MF. What is the ERP you're getting from your 200mW signal? 73, Stefan [...] Content analysis details: (-1.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 1f795a2ee1ecd56682b47ad11969b3d3 Subject: Re: LF: 474.2KHz WSPR Test 200mW RF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8b519dfe2f1111 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Eddie, I'm monitoring WSPR on MF. What is the ERP you're getting from your 200mW signal? 73, Stefan Am 23.05.2013 12:27, schrieb g3zjo: > Hi LF > > The bad WX has forced me into the shack from the garden work. > > I am testing a new unit generating WSPR 200mW of RF to the antenna. > Pleased to see G4KPX and G0VQH receiving any more reports would be > very welcome. > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO