Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 227A1380000A2; Tue, 21 May 2013 18:18:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ueus1-0005pL-4Q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 23:17:25 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ueus0-0005pA-Gj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 23:17:24 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Ueury-0003XD-Hg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 May 2013 23:17:23 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4LMHLpA000675 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 May 2013 00:17:22 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r4LMHMA9015135 for ; Wed, 22 May 2013 00:17:22 +0200 Message-ID: <519BF26C.1060701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 00:17:16 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Joe, LF, Joe/DF2JP, i can hear you OP8 LF signal very well here. We could try a CW QSO. Christian and me, we've asked if you can do CW but we get no reply from you. So maybe the message is lost in a spam filter?? That's why i want to try it here... [...] Content analysis details: (-1.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -1.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: LF: DF2JP ?? DF5QG... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4084519bf2a678fe X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Joe, LF, Joe/DF2JP, i can hear you OP8 LF signal very well here. We could try a CW QSO. Christian and me, we've asked if you can do CW but we get no reply from you. So maybe the message is lost in a spam filter?? That's why i want to try it here... DF5QG and DK7FC had a > 1 hour long CW QSO despite high QRN in the night. Another QSO in the early afternoon was successful too, of course. Here is a short audio recording generated in SpecLab: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/19882028/LF/DF5QG_LF_CW2.WAV 73, Stefan/DK7FC