Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E328F380000BC; Tue, 14 May 2013 06:59:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UcCvg-0000cl-Ut for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:58:00 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UcCvg-0000cc-Ij for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:58:00 +0100 Received: from mta31.charter.net ([216.33.127.82]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UcCve-0004FL-Oe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 14 May 2013 11:57:59 +0100 Received: from imp09 ([10.20.200.9]) by mta31.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20130514105736.SSZC24708.mta31.charter.net@imp09> for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 06:57:36 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.143] ([75.130.249.69]) by imp09 with smtp.charter.net id bmxc1l0051Wb5Uj05mxc5T; Tue, 14 May 2013 06:57:36 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Cp/n6QED c=1 sm=1 a=5hGFLARdMX34Lrtx4DhkEA==:17 a=QUiRZEtCktgA:10 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=7lfCNNkZjSAA:10 a=uu9AXg0kKNvLVq_mgSMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=5hGFLARdMX34Lrtx4DhkEA==:117 Message-ID: <51921A3B.8070009@charter.net> Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 07:04:27 -0400 From: John Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Had one "hit" in monitoring WSPR-15 on 2200 meters last night: 0315 2 -37 -0.9 0.137622 G8HUH IO81 23 That's a good illustration that the underlying propagation continues despite rising noise levels and the beginnings of increased solar activity. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [216.33.127.82 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: e4383209d2ccb9552700d53c0b540538 Subject: LF: WSPR-15 Last Night Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4119519219033f9f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Had one "hit" in monitoring WSPR-15 on 2200 meters last night: 0315 2 -37 -0.9 0.137622 G8HUH IO81 23 That's a good illustration that the underlying propagation continues despite rising noise levels and the beginnings of increased solar activity. John, W1TAG FN42ch