Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5CEEB380000A8; Fri, 3 May 2013 05:58:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UYCjF-0008Kl-Vq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 10:56:37 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UYCjF-0008KQ-F7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 10:56:37 +0100 Received: from nm2-vm6.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([212.82.99.217]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UYCjC-00030t-UB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 May 2013 10:56:36 +0100 Received: from [212.82.98.44] by nm2.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 09:56:12 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.164] by tm5.bt.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 09:56:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp105.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2013 09:56:12 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1367574972; bh=GBg0kMyiSakg8KIAkAbobVXDHivbus+zU4cYSwEJT4g=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=VdfMo9SgR8tBxUdl6Fzk8bmcufo9rxQok/5vO6cZlCGhufGF6M+C+GhlDJ50+8hIvzbGUQ/Tuy1u09cpnKyjSeh3DGEz6uRBOnW9k3o0ho41ie8hcBMKaaZ8xb5iOK+OGJUXnf3Jeb/zf3H0kYWl4TVbr2qGnO4mNqLq6RrNmb4= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 755270.5327.bm@smtp105.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: MUCFCZ4VM1k.HkyWRPWcgSSb0t98H_VsQkmFyBVeGRAR0o_ FY8nEk_tkOGkYFEFX.5CwGl.HzyiBHQ_hiJd4ahkw5Yd7i0apzMsImqjdq_4 54zLV2XsPaGUhejiAXz3.ejBQz17..HFKsaSmuGmCFsuLfyG7iswe1KlgzEy OMYaUdo9P4M4H2PBja3LODlzoh8OU5viKZutSQVZS8lpU9SNH00kfrLE_evE BfF4lIFzu1qDFHBERN3EuYrEb68HO6.tgc9Tma4Bd3m2U5OQ0j0rp.vBf636 HqXnG9c.dapMr6_lZkfpAYjGVrv2iCYYWhBC0W7erTY.RTo5jEom.I5GV5bH ZBg6n3IXTcMtucqkgnr2kDQHTuatKnGEr7iwS.NbEH7jv6Deaz1umse18qhT RB8TQLSpmp9jzWDz68gD_upfAM6LeABgD69dUdwPByCQRJK0N6nT7bI.heMb b40pAPM53rsST0L9KVA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-Rocket-Received: from gnat (alan.melia@86.167.13.182 with login) by smtp105.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 May 2013 09:56:12 +0000 UTC Message-ID: <18357E8AF4C845E5933A0C3431DEC548@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <776311A518F6F642962EC561A9184090D4DE39E288@THSONEP02CMB01P.one-02-priv.grp> Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 10:36:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130502-1, 02/05/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: You bet we have! but since the days of on-line data sheets they tend to live in the loft nowadays :-)) Also mid 1980s "IC Master".... thick ,heavy, but worth its weight in silicon chips :-)) Alan G3NYK [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.99.217 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 40d35b6fcf8b66e4fec28fa30f99f125 Subject: LF: Re: RE: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0004_01CE47EA.0452D5E0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_60_70, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-de02.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ca51838a2a59dc X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CE47EA.0452D5E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You bet we have! but since the days of on-line data sheets they tend to = live in the loft nowadays :-)) Also mid 1980s "IC Master".... thick = ,heavy, but worth its weight in silicon chips :-)) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message -----=20 From: REEVES Paul=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 7:50 AM Subject: LF: RE: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS Hasn't anyone still got their copy of the TI 'TTL Data Book'? = Absolutely the bible on such things back in the 70s/80s - I've still got = mine (plus supplements) - and in hardback too! TI knew how engineers = mistreat their books... Still need it due to boxes of 'spare' TTL = waiting for a project. Of course, everyone uses FPGAs now :-( =20 73's Paul G8GJA =20 From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Graham Sent: 02 May 2013 22:46 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS =20 74LS196N 74S196N Difference ?? L or LS divider chip=20 =20 What is the difference anyone ?? =20 =20 =20 Tnx -G. =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CE47EA.0452D5E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You bet we have! but since the days of = on-line data=20 sheets they tend to live in the loft nowadays :-)) Also mid 1980s "IC=20 Master".... thick ,heavy, but worth its weight in silicon chips=20 :-))
 
Alan
G3NYK
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 REEVES Paul
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 7:50 = AM
Subject: LF: RE: 74LS196N = 74S196N=20 Difference ?? L or LS

Hasn't=20 anyone still got their copy of the TI  'TTL Data Book'?  = Absolutely=20 the bible on such things back in the 70s/80s - I've still got mine = (plus=20 supplements) - and in hardback too! TI knew how engineers mistreat = their=20 books=85=85.   Still need it due to boxes of 'spare' TTL = waiting for a=20 project. Of course, everyone uses FPGAs now :-(

 

73's

Paul     =20 G8GJA

 

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@bl= acksheep.org=20 [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of=20 Graham
Sent: 02 May 2013 22:46
To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: 74LS196N 74S196N=20 Difference ?? L or LS

 

74LS196N    74S196N  = Difference =20 ?? L or  LS     divider   chip=20

 

What is the  = difference  anyone =20 ??

 

 

 

Tnx -G.

 

  =20

------=_NextPart_000_0004_01CE47EA.0452D5E0--