Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BFE72380000B1; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:16:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UPzAa-0001FE-AS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:50:52 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UPzAZ-0001F5-Jy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:50:51 +0100 Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UPzAX-0008UQ-SO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:50:50 +0100 Received: by mail-ie0-f173.google.com with SMTP id 10so823211ied.18 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:50:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=nlx6R3nj3lTarJd2lgU+cbTcfgiTS4GfVH7AvPIyuEE=; b=Giqhk2BXN5Aodj0sC1enM0cy8Fe/Olope9uvPPtlEZHYxeOlySd/gW+ZRlF7z9BwUk lZIajBMz+gfaQ+iqKlW9bhHkb0fD8YpG2dsvUtZix7RzKZLXuDTxdjN1riuKgbU62LrW TKmuYf3HpqeTcq/HOLoGGdGDuTGB43TQlqSXTEgrPd0P8dHmuZ33CtaVuDuTnOflDo7J n7llX+ksqebnwFjpMpfIXDf/CNAWZ7KGSp9IV1NlqSDjJQh25UvKzjJDlkEsX/kHyWgW oH5b82j/ACD6HhCJqxcl8WTwcykxMMuKzkYgjA7l5i9RKC1UsHXgLok9VPVOd6iBWPvp x+Fw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.55.10 with SMTP id n10mr2139192igp.112.1365616226560; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.3.72 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 10:50:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [80.195.207.132] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:50:26 +0100 Message-ID: From: DAVE PICK To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkMlS4Wm7C88T1POOBXGept2DukTWbA+qjvtFTMRBmATZ8eeCOMqTrg/kj+s9pJx1zKD+Yj X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I have been using that system for years on my class D TXs. I out the Hall sensor near the end of the ferrite rod choke feeding DC to the o/p transformer. http://www.wireless.org.uk/136rig.htm On 8 April 2013 19:15, Warren Ziegler wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.223.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: Re: LF: Hall Effect for Over-current shutdown? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ffbae771579ff04da054ecb X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40c95165ac885540 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --e89a8ffbae771579ff04da054ecb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I have been using that system for years on my class D TXs. I out the Hall sensor near the end of the ferrite rod choke feeding DC to the o/p transformer. http://www.wireless.org.uk/136rig.htm On 8 April 2013 19:15, Warren Ziegler wrote: > Anyone using a Hall effect device for overcurrent sensing and shutdown in > a MOSFET amplifer? > > -- > 73 Warren K2ORS > WD2XGJ > WD2XSH/23 > WE2XEB/2 > WE2XGR/1 > > > --e89a8ffbae771579ff04da054ecb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have been using that system for years on my class D= TXs. I out the Hall sensor near the end of the ferrite rod choke feeding D= C to the o/p transformer.
http://www.wireless.org.uk/136rig.htm


On 8 Ap= ril 2013 19:15, Warren Ziegler <wd2xgj@gmail.com> wrote:
<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px= #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Anyone using a Hall effect device for overcurrent sensing = and shutdown in a MOSFET amplifer?

--
73 Warren K2ORS
=A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XGJ
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WD2XSH/23
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 WE2XEB/2
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 WE2XGR/1

=A0

--e89a8ffbae771579ff04da054ecb--