Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C809638000098; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 14:20:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UVmgr-0002yA-TQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:44:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UVmgr-0002y1-GX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:44:09 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UVmgp-00068H-Qz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:44:08 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3QHi7IE018969 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:44:07 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r3QHi6A7010428 for ; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:44:06 +0200 Message-ID: <517ABCE1.8060802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:44:01 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Warren, What is the voltage between the tree (GND) and loop? I thought that the voltages are rather small, i.e. below 100V, especially when a large loop is used. Isn't it possible to ground the loop? [...] Content analysis details: (-2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120 Subject: Re: LF: Fire in the wire Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4118517ac54f1aad X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Warren, What is the voltage between the tree (GND) and loop? I thought that the voltages are rather small, i.e. below 100V, especially when a large loop is used. Isn't it possible to ground the loop? 73, Stefan Am 26.04.2013 19:21, schrieb Warren Ziegler: > > Just a quick report on a failure mode for LF TX antennas. > Last Fall my original TX loop made up of approximately 500 feet of > RG-11 coax suspended from trees went open circuit (both center > conductor and shield), some time later part of the wire actually came > down. I had thought that abrasion from contact with the trees had > eventually worn through it. > > What I found was a little more interesting. Looking at the downed end, > it appeared that the insulation had melted for a considerable distance > and there were burn marks further up the cable. My hypothesis is that > the outer insulation was abraded away and the coax shield came into > contact with the tree limb causing the burning/melting. > Will try to get some pictures this weekend and put them up on my website. > > Long term if one wants to operate at the kW level either better > insulation or a better way of supporting the antenna than trees would > be required! > > -- > 73 Warren K2ORS > WD2XGJ > WD2XSH/23 > WE2XEB/2 > WE2XGR/1 >