Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A7C56380000D2; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:02:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UODm4-0004WQ-1K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 22:02:16 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UODm3-0004WH-Fz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 22:02:15 +0100 Received: from imr-mb01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.207.164]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UODm1-0007QR-5S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 22:02:14 +0100 Received: from mtaout-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.67]) by imr-mb01.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id E611B1C000113; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:01:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (host-92-8-85-210.as43234.net [92.8.85.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-mb03.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 9954FE00018E; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:01:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <515F3BBA.5030204@aol.com> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 22:01:46 +0100 From: pat Organization: G4GVW User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: Gary - G4WGT , rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk References: <7265ADFC5C9A48D18EB0833139E2155A@GaryAsus> In-Reply-To: <7265ADFC5C9A48D18EB0833139E2155A@GaryAsus> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1365195710; bh=Bl7MWzYWk79nTmeFzJO0iYGVMR4KVxwfSrMCcLIb0eg=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ff/HL4vpSnK1LdeR+f1taVF/lDmJ0N1qLgCKSzwMUtPPl0JynfUnUVX6OyqHK4TKA RNKU4ZL8r+XAPiNY296BlSFOrwd1LIhHb+A2Gz0AKpt92Nlz4hB+fjK4W1ANWFOra5 Nu2+IAj6ysqnYW9MTnb/rcYm+bRXR2EV2FHvwVxA= X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:386222720:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 05/04/13 18:27, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > Hi All, Gary, It's clear confirmation of one of my thoughts. If I were to put it in easy terms I would have to say your problem is that the birds are on higher perches and you have been taking large deposits! How you create a hedge against this is going to require some blue skies thinking. If you crow about the situation you will just be parroting their parliament and attracting a gaggle of onlookers! Don't be gulled into a false sense of security or you might find yourself pigeonholed. Grousing about the situation won't help either. The eagle-eyed among us will spot an attempt at a birdie from quite a range! Robin' Peter to pay Paul won't help at this time of swiftly soaring costs and you will have to swallow hard. Lofted as high as they are, your antennas should, ideally. be nested! I am sure there is a claws in my contract to stop me at this point before I branch out further! [...] Content analysis details: (-2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [64.12.207.164 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (g4gvw[at]aol.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b42857a5fad6e32377447282c21f62b1 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Slightly OT - Birds (the feathered kind) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010504060109090506070800" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : mx.aol.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6009515f3c037a2a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010504060109090506070800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 05/04/13 18:27, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > Hi All, Gary, It's clear confirmation of one of my thoughts. If I were to put it in easy terms I would have to say your problem is that the birds are on higher perches and you have been taking large deposits! How you create a hedge against this is going to require some blue skies thinking. If you crow about the situation you will just be parroting their parliament and attracting a gaggle of onlookers! Don't be gulled into a false sense of security or you might find yourself pigeonholed. Grousing about the situation won't help either. The eagle-eyed among us will spot an attempt at a birdie from quite a range! Robin' Peter to pay Paul won't help at this time of swiftly soaring costs and you will have to swallow hard. Lofted as high as they are, your antennas should, ideally. be nested! I am sure there is a claws in my contract to stop me at this point before I branch out further! > Have a look at the photo from this evening about 6:15 pm local time, > this is more like the number of starlings which regularly perch on my > antenna :- > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/15990181/Birds%20on%20Ant.JPG > 73, Gary - G4WGT. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Gary - G4WGT > *To:* LF Group ; > rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk > > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 02, 2013 9:42 PM > *Subject:* Slightly OT - Birds (the feathered kind) > > Hi All, > I am being bothered by lots of starlings perching on my HF/MF top > load capacity hat & messing on everthing that happens to be > below in my small garden, ie. the washing & windows etc, which > really annoys my wife. > Does anyone use any form of bird deterant with any success ? > I have heard of model Falcons perched on the antenna but does it > really work ? > 73, Gary - G4WGT. > -- 73 de pat g4gvw es gd dx qth nr Felixstowe East Coast UK --------------010504060109090506070800 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 05/04/13 18:27, Gary - G4WGT wrote:
Hi All,
 
Gary,
It's clear confirmation of one of my thoughts. If I were to put it in easy terms I would have to say your problem is that the birds are on higher perches and you have been taking large deposits!
How you create a hedge against this is going to require some blue skies thinking. If you crow about the situation you will just be parroting their parliament and attracting a gaggle of onlookers!
Don't be gulled into a false sense of security or you might find yourself pigeonholed.
Grousing about the situation won't help either. The eagle-eyed among us will spot an attempt at a birdie from quite a range! Robin' Peter to pay Paul won't help at this time of swiftly soaring costs and you will have to swallow hard.
Lofted as high as they are, your antennas should, ideally. be nested!
I am sure there is a claws in  my contract to stop me at this point before I branch out further!



 
Have a look at the photo from this evening about 6:15 pm local time, this is more like the number of starlings which regularly perch on my antenna :-
 
 
73, Gary - G4WGT.
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 9:42 PM
Subject: Slightly OT - Birds (the feathered kind)

Hi All,
 
I am being bothered by lots of starlings perching on my HF/MF top load capacity hat & messing on everthing that happens to be below in my small garden, ie. the washing & windows etc, which really annoys my wife.
 
Does anyone use any form of bird deterant with any success ?
 
I have heard of model Falcons  perched on the antenna but does it really work ?
 
73, Gary - G4WGT.
 
 


-- 
73 de pat g4gvw
es gd dx
qth nr Felixstowe
East Coast UK
--------------010504060109090506070800--