Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 91ACE38000097; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:54:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UD2Dz-00008U-Vw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:28:51 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UD2Dz-00008L-Fh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:28:51 +0000 Received: from smtpout1.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.29] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UD2Dx-0003OD-7J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 00:28:50 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.46.177]) by mwinf5d04 with ME id 80UT1l0083pMz2S030UTvU; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 01:28:28 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <58DDEF66BD1F4FCDA781E159BB3130D4@GaryAsus> <5133BADE.9070906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5133C67A.10300@psk31.plus.com> <5133C9E6.5070406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5133D161.4080703@psk31.plus.com> <5134A7AB.6020202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5134F966.5090807@psk31.plus.com> <5135D5E8.7040304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5135FDDC.2020100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1AD9CFA88EB9476B81C3CD9EE515BB31@PcMinto> <51362618.2040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51364368.3090204@psk31.plus.com> <51364D95.7090009@psk31.plus.com> <93266BE26B7D4C14A04471501FB9D23A@AGB> <51367D85.2020607@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <51367D85.2020607@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 00:28:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I think mark is high , shift hf from space , fldigi has mark high as well , logging default is mark=qrg , I could not get fldigi to print , but mmtty (new v) did with the rev button -in- how is Stefan generating rtty , is there a mixer involved ? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.29 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 7a302ec14fb4a62f16f049454b6dc54d Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0084_01CE1A01.85235DA0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600a513693e214dd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01CE1A01.85235DA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think mark is high , shift hf from space , fldigi has mark = high as well , logging default is mark=3Dqrg , I could not get = fldigi to print , but mmtty (new v) did with the rev button = -in- =20 how is Stefan generating rtty , is there a mixer involved ? G.. From: g3zjo=20 Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 11:19 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission On 05/03/2013 22:14, Graham wrote:=20 why is the 'REV' button 'in' on MMTTY then mark =3D 1163 = Hz with 477 usb dial set ? G. Corr I haven't run that for years. Hmm, it seems to indicate the same = Mark frequency whether the REV is pushed or not, is that anything to do = with it. Ed From: g3zjo=20 Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:55 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission On 05/03/2013 19:43, Graham wrote:=20 Is the shift reversed ? G.. ?? No. Ed From: g3zjo=20 Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:11 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission Also Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/lfgrabber.html Wide View, showing your signal. Eddie On 05/03/2013 17:06, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote:=20 Minto,=20 I'm excited. Was that you a few minutes ago?=20 I was writing in real time some stuff to my program which sent the = stuff in RTTY immediately. The TX was in idle mode during that time. = suddenly someone answered! "big brother is watching you" and so. Was = that you?? It looks like my PA is blown up once again. It is simply not = designed for a key-down transmission, so the idle mode is not ideal, = except i'm using a fan. Now i will once again replace 2x IRFZ48N and be = on air in 1 hour or earlier. Let us try the QSO then again, OK? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_0084_01CE1A01.85235DA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I think mark is   high , shift  hf  from  = space ,=20 fldigi    has mark high as well  ,   = logging =20 default  is  mark=3Dqrg  , I could not get fldigi = to =20 print  , but  mmtty (new  v)  did  with = the =20 rev   button -in- 
 
how is  Stefan  generating   rtty  , is=20 there  a  mixer involved  ?
 
G..
 

From: g3zjo
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 11:19 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test = transmission

On 05/03/2013 22:14, Graham wrote:=20
why is the  'REV'  button   'in'  on=20 MMTTY   then     mark =3D 1163 =20 Hz   with   477 usb  dial set  = ?
 
G.
Corr I haven't run that for years. Hmm, it = seems to=20 indicate the same Mark frequency whether the REV is pushed or not, is = that=20 anything to do with it.

Ed

From: g3zjo
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test = transmission

On 05/03/2013 19:43, Graham wrote:=20
Is the  shift  reversed ?
 
G..

?? No.

Ed

From: g3zjo
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:11 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test = transmission

Also Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/lfgrabber.html=

Wide=20 View, showing your signal.

Eddie

On 05/03/2013 17:06, = Stefan=20 Sch=C3=A4fer wrote:=20
Minto,

I'm excited. Was that you a few = minutes ago?=20
I was writing in real time some stuff to my program which sent = the=20 stuff in RTTY immediately. The TX was in idle mode during that = time.=20 suddenly someone answered! "big brother is watching you" and so. = Was that=20 you??
It looks like my PA is blown up once again. It is simply = not=20 designed for a key-down transmission, so the idle mode is not = ideal,=20 except i'm using a fan. Now i will once again replace 2x IRFZ48N = and be on=20 air in 1 hour or earlier. Let us try the QSO then again, OK?=20 :-)

73,=20 Stefan/DK7FC



------=_NextPart_000_0084_01CE1A01.85235DA0--