Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B8796380000BE; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:48:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDG3J-0007ps-4J for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:14:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDG3I-0007pd-6S for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:14:44 +0000 Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDG3G-0007BE-4e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:14:43 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c41so5913182eek.13 for ; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:14:21 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority:importance :x-mailer:x-mimeole; bh=dzmO1alYL8dei0JzZPpDo4V31qVaLMLSKMRWaeQjKNY=; b=W4pQR/mhcnUECSNQl4BBEDjVc2hcCODhSFTz094aY8NiORv+m39j4bQBU/58hyhDDc 5Vk0zt3Eds3lzJYUF6ZpNdVBkf5tAfVU1yIQ4pacYm+edRIL9v7jtMpwgbVEw03aMhOL q//HkmwWTklHXzwNNKTRMq1LD+aZrZU5nxSg5X8oRGyCUCUeZp1nJ8w7srlckkzZfsnW Y6cbo8XnOfHJdYCJkwckFTgL6QeJSx84R9b90h7QPBFT8Q7KXXhiCQWWjWDiQ2ejRF5n UIqAB9Ewnl3APrVX88BNzt2froMbO+NTi12tNKB33aDVOBtD80IDxAuUIOuI8wTFoLvc UlAQ== X-Received: by 10.14.209.131 with SMTP id s3mr15619111eeo.26.1362582861449; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:14:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from PcMinto (dhcp-077-248-065-057.chello.nl. [77.248.65.57]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u44sm42972587eel.7.2013.03.06.07.14.20 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Mar 2013 07:14:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: From: Minto Witteveen To: References: <58DDEF66BD1F4FCDA781E159BB3130D4@GaryAsus> <5133BADE.9070906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5133C67A.10300@psk31.plus.com> <5133C9E6.5070406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5133D161.4080703@psk31.plus.com> <5134A7AB.6020202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5134F966.5090807@psk31.plus.com> <5135D5E8.7040304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5135FDDC.2020100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1AD9CFA88EB9476B81C3CD9EE515BB31@PcMinto> <51362618.2040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5137148F.1090402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5137266C.7030703@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <5137266C.7030703@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:14:19 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Your (and mine) RTTY signals on Twente WebSDR were obviously not good enough for a decent QSO. Yesterday you were much stronger at the same time, definitely good enough for a comfortable QSO [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [74.125.83.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (minto.witteveen[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: b4085bc26841e34d79a2f3beb8f287b1 Subject: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00EB_01CE1A85.A8454E90" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40585137653d0879 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00EB_01CE1A85.A8454E90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan, Your (and mine) RTTY signals on Twente WebSDR were obviously not good = enough for a decent QSO. Yesterday you were much stronger at the same time, definitely good = enough for a comfortable QSO My own signal was also significantly weaker than yesterday. which is a = bit strange as I am only 115 km from Twente. Well better luck next time? 73=92s Minto pa3bca -------------------------------------------------------------------------= - Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission Am 06.03.2013 11:03, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:=20 [...] The beacon was running through the night but now i see that it has = stopped. However the program is still running. So maybe the PA blew up = again, despite the fan. Still don't know it. SpecLab terminated itselfe (scheduled actions weren't disabled) so there = was to audio feed from VAC1 to the AF output since 22 UTC last night. So = the system is now running again without problems.=20 I made minor changes to the beacon text, including the vvv on the = beginning. 73, Stefan ------=_NextPart_000_00EB_01CE1A85.A8454E90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan,
Your (and mine) RTTY signals on Twente WebSDR were obviously not = good=20 enough for a decent QSO.
Yesterday you were much stronger at the same time, definitely good = enough=20 for a comfortable QSO
 
My own signal was also significantly weaker than yesterday. which = is a bit=20 strange as I am only 115 km from Twente.
 
Well better luck next time?
 
73=92s Minto pa3bca
 
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------= -------
Ceterum=20 censeo Carthaginem delendam esse
 
From: Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:20
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test = transmission
 

Am=20 06.03.2013 11:03, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:=20
[...]

The beacon was running through the night = but now i=20 see that it has stopped. However the program is still running. So = maybe the PA=20 blew up again, despite the fan. Still don't know = it.
SpecLab=20 terminated itselfe (scheduled actions weren't disabled) so there was to = audio=20 feed from VAC1 to the AF output since 22 UTC last night. So the system = is now=20 running again without problems.
I made minor changes to the beacon = text,=20 including the vvv on the beginning.

73,=20 Stefan
------=_NextPart_000_00EB_01CE1A85.A8454E90--