Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A576138000141; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:24:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UJ6DQ-0001pK-4P for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:57:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UJ6DP-0001pB-FF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:57:19 +0000 Received: from smtpa1.mediabeam.com ([194.25.41.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ6DM-0001kC-Tv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:57:18 +0000 Received: from IMAP1 (balancer7.mediabeam.com [10.100.1.80]) by smtpa1.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r2MHusNS000539 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:56:54 +0100 Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:56:52 +0100 From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: <919c99d265d841f49e869c4353463502@kabelmail.de> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Eddie, I noticed you activated the vlf grabber. tks for it. GL Uwe/dj8ex Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 22.03.2013 15:01 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.25.41.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 77a0a2f41e380940c0e08c95737baa3b Subject: Re: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----D88AD38CE7AD437F9B18CD918C1B96A4" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d7514ca1e34572 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------D88AD38CE7AD437F9B18CD918C1B96A4 Content-type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Eddie, I noticed you activated the vlf grabber=2E tks for it=2E GL Uwe/dj8ex Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Gesendet: 22=2E03=2E2013 15:01 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Betreff: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970=2E000 Hz=2E (~ 0=2E001 Hz= ) Uwe Looking good in the UK today too=2E http://www=2Eg3zjo=2Etalktalk=2Enet/vlfgrabber=2Ehtm 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 22/03/2013 09:16, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: =20 Uwe,=20 Looks stable and very strong over the night=2E=20 That step in my 238 uHz window is because DHO went QRT for 1h=2E=20 I use DHO 23=2E4 KHz experimental as reference in only this 238=A0uHz w= indow=2E=20 At 09h UTC today I did switch back to 22k1 as reference for Specrum Lab= =2E=20 At 06h30 was your signal very strong today=2E=20 The cursor say's=A0-116dB at that moment=2E=20 Where do I read the noise=A0floor in Spectrum Lab ?=20 Average of the Yellow grab ?=20 In that case Noise is -140dB=20 Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB=20 www=2Eqsl=2Enet/pa1sdb=20 ----- Original Message ----- =20 From: PA1SDB, Peter =20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg =20 Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:24 PM=20 Subject: Re: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970=2E000 Hz=2E (~ 0=2E001= Hz)=20 Hi Uwe,=20 Between ~11 and ~16 h UTC today was stabillity perfect=2E=20 Befor 11 was a short break and also after 16 h=20 Not sure how it is right now=2E=20 The new traces are building slowly and the picture is not complete yet=2E= =20 73's, Peter=2E=20 PA1SDB=20 www=2Eqsl=2Enet/pa1sdb=20 ----- Original Message ----- =20 From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail=2Ede =20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg =20 Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 2:23 PM=20 Subject: Re: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970=2E000 Hz=2E (~ 0=2E001= Hz)=20 Hi Peter and Eddie, thanks for the hint=2E GL Uwe/dj8wx Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Gesendet: 20=2E03=2E2013 11:07 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg Betreff: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970=2E000 Hz=2E (~ 0=2E001 Hz= ) Hi Peter / Uwe Maybe that explains why when I ran my my Grabber yesterday I could det= ect nothing=2E I haven't been running any 8=2E9KHz for a while as my WS= PR on 474KHz makes a mess=2E 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 20/03/2013 06:28, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: =20 Hello Uwe,=20 Your signal is not very stable now=2E=20 www=2Eqsl=2Enet/pa1sdb=20 It feels not good to me to complain about 0=2E001 Hz drift, but=A0I hop= e you understand when you take a look at my grabber ;-)=20 Thanks anyway for all=A0the experimental broadcast's=2E=20 Best 73's, Peter - PA1SDB ------D88AD38CE7AD437F9B18CD918C1B96A4 Content-type: text/html; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Eddie,

I noticed you activated the vlf grabber=2E
tks for it=2E

GL
Uwe/dj8ex
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Gesendet: 22=2E03=2E2013 15:01
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Betreff: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970=2E000 Hz=2E (~ 0=2E001 Hz)=

Uwe

Looking good in the UK today too=2E

http://www=2Eg3zjo=2Etalktalk=2Enet/vlfgrabber=2E= htm

73 Eddie G3ZJO

On 22/03/2013 09:16, PA1SDB, Peter wrote:
Uwe,
Looks stable and very strong= over the night=2E
That step in my 238 uHz wind= ow is because DHO went QRT for 1h=2E
I use DHO 23=2E4 KHz experim= ental as reference in only this 238 uHz window=2E
At 09h UTC today I did switc= h back to 22k1 as reference for Specrum Lab=2E
 
At 06h30 was your signal ver= y strong today=2E
The cursor say's -116dB= at that moment=2E
 
Where do I read the noise&nb= sp;floor in Spectrum Lab ?
Average of the Yellow grab ?=
In that case Noise is -140dB=
 
Best 73's, Peter PA1SDB
www=2Eqsl=2Enet/pa1sdb<= /div>
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, March= 21, 2013 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: = Not very stable now at 8970=2E000 Hz=2E (~ 0=2E001 Hz)

Hi Uwe,
Between ~11 and ~16 h UTC to= day was stabillity perfect=2E
Befor 11 was a short break a= nd also after 16 h
Not sure how it is right now= =2E
The new traces are building = slowly and the picture is not complete yet=2E
 
73's, Peter=2E
 
PA1SDB
www=2Eqsl=2Enet/pa1sdb<= /div>
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, Marc= h 20, 2013 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: Re: LF: = Not very stable now at 8970=2E000 Hz=2E (~ 0=2E001 Hz)

Hi Peter and Eddie,

thanks for the hint=2E

GL
Uwe/dj8wx
Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Gesendet: 20=2E03=2E2013 11:07
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep=2Eorg
Betreff: Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970=2E000 Hz=2E (~ 0=2E001 Hz)

Hi Peter / Uwe

Maybe that explains why when I ran my my Grabber yesterday I could detect nothing=2E I haven't been running any 8=2E9KHz for a while as my WSPR on 474KHz makes a mess=2E

73 Eddie G3ZJO

On 20/03/2013 06:28, PA1SDB, Peter wrote:
Hello Uwe,
Your signal is not very stable now=2E
 
 
It feels not good to me to complain about 0=2E001 Hz drift, but I hope you understand when you take a look at my grabber ;-)
 
Thanks anyway for all the experimental broadcast's=2E
 
3D""
 
 
Best 73's, Peter - PA1SDB 
 
 
 


------D88AD38CE7AD437F9B18CD918C1B96A4--