Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C7FA138000092; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:19:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UHfEM-0005qn-1Q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:56:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UHfEL-0005qe-Jt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:56:21 +0000 Received: from mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.tiscali.co.uk ([212.74.100.54] helo=mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UHfEJ-0002pd-54 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:56:20 +0000 X-Trace: 837566289/mk-filter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$THROTTLED_DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/88.109.57.170/None/g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 88.109.57.170 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: g4wgt@tiscali.co.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM X-MUA: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlQJAKpiR1FYbTmq/2dsb2JhbABDxRgEAYFVF3SCJAEBBAEIKgEFHhUTBgEEBQMDEQQBAQolMwYWCAYTCAmHfQoIwhKNegUFFnASBhCCSWEDiD+UCYsYgwo8 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,866,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="837566289" Received: from 88-109-57-170.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO GaryAsus) ([88.109.57.170]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with SMTP; 18 Mar 2013 18:55:57 +0000 Message-ID: <793F553720D74214880053414E30E0FE@GaryAsus> From: "Gary - G4WGT" To: References: <51473057.7050307@broadpark.no> <514732B6.5070003@broadpark.no> <5147378C.9000103@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <5147378C.9000103@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:55:56 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Receiving your Navtex quite well. I am using TrueTTY software with Amtor-FEC (fast sync). 73, Gary - G4WGT. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.74.100.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (g4wgt[at]tiscali.co.uk) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 9ca91679b330d65f05d707c2d2b164fe Subject: Re: LF: NAVTEX vs AMTOR-FEC Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=5.0 tests=LINES_OF_YELLING, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc146514768ad21c8 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan, Receiving your Navtex quite well. I am using TrueTTY software with Amtor-FEC (fast sync). 73, Gary - G4WGT. _ZCZC ZI01 VV_ TEST TEST TEST NAVTEX BEACON DE DK7FC DK7FC DK7FC LOCATOR: JN49IK JN49IK JN49I F_KU_HEIDELB_TEFAN STEFAN STEFAN TX: HOMEMADE CLASS-D PA RUNNING ABOUT 50W FROM A 12V SUPPLY ANT: INV-L 30M UP AND 70M LONG REPORTS WELCOME VIA RSGB LF REFLECTOR (AT BLACKSHEEP.ORG). TNX FOR REPORTS TO: PA0RDT, G3GMS, PA3FNY, IK2GFT, F4DTL, DG3LV 73 73 73 73 _ NNNN ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 3:49 PM Subject: Re: LF: NAVTEX vs AMTOR-FEC > Steinar, > > See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navtex#Technical_Information > > However some of the experts may want to add further informations. I would > like to know them as well :-) > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 18.03.2013 16:28, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >> Hummmmm, This went wrong. It was meant to be a question: >> >> What is the advantage of NAVTEX over AMTOR-FEC? >> >> >> LA5VNA Steinar >> loc:JO59jq >> >> >> Den 18.03.2013 16:18, skrev Steinar Aanesland: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> The advantage of NAVTEX over AMTOR-FEC >>> >>> >> > >