Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2345F38000178; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:29:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UJ4Jl-0001aD-Nl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:55:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UJ4Jl-0001a4-4r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:55:45 +0000 Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.4]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ4Jj-0001N4-6Z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:55:44 +0000 Received: from F6CNIAndyHP (unknown [83.153.241.20]) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 97B5F4C80D0; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:55:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5AD60F16A4E043DC86AB1D3EF500029F@F6CNIAndyHP> From: =?utf-8?Q?Andre_Guy=C3=A9?= To: Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:55:15 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3508.1109 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3508.1109 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130322-0, 22/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I am sorry, my message was not clear about “the best windows for receiving”. Please modify the red line as : Using 474200 Hz USB dial, the best windows for receiving WSPR 2 here are : 475610-475630, 475670-475690 and 475770-475790 Hz. For WSPR 15 : 475815 + / - 3 Hertz. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.27.42.4 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 41a44ec7f64a884bcdc566aa8432178a Subject: LF: VK reception test next days on WSPR MF. Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0010_01CE271E.06919770" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_FONTCOLOR_BLUE, HTML_FONTCOLOR_RED,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408d514c86e23c6b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Ce message est compos et au format MIME. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01CE271E.06919770 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am sorry, my message was not clear about =E2=80=9Cthe best windows for = receiving=E2=80=9D. Please modify the red line as : Using 474200 Hz USB dial, the best windows for receiving WSPR 2 here are = : 475610-475630, 475670-475690 and 475770-475790 Hz. For WSPR 15 : = 475815 + / - 3 Hertz. Andy. P.S. My RX is just running now. From: Andre Guy=C3=A9=20 Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 7:27 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Subject: LF: VK reception test next days on WSPR MF. Info to VK stations. Good conditions now to VK on 160 meters CW. Why not on MF band ? I=E2=80=99ll be listening WSPR 2 and WSPR 15, each evening from march 22 = to 31. QTR 1730 =E2=80=93 1830 TU. QRG 474.200 kHz USB. I think that = testing the WSPR 15 be a good idea=E2=80=A6 Using a special RX antenna : 40 =E2=80=93 100 =E2=80=93 40 feet EWE = antenna on 75=C2=B0 azimuth.=20 The best windows for receiving WSPR 2 here are : 1610-1630, 1670-1690 = and 1770-1790 Hz. For WSPR 15 it is 1815 + / - 3 Hertz. Again : here not transmitting, only receiving on MF. Best 73. Andy F6CNI. JN19QB. ------=_NextPart_000_0010_01CE271E.06919770 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am sorry, my message was = not clear=20 about =E2=80=9Cthe best windows for receiving=E2=80=9D. Please modify = the red line as=20 :
 
Using = 474200 Hz USB dial,=20 the best windows for receiving WSPR 2 here are : 475610-475630, = 475670-475690=20 and 475770-475790 Hz. For WSPR 15 : 475815 + / - 3 Hertz.
 
Andy.
 
P.S. My RX is just running=20 now.
 
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 7:27 PM
Subject: LF: VK reception test next days on WSPR=20 MF.
 
 
Info to VK=20 stations.
 
Good conditions now to VK = on 160 meters=20 CW. Why not on MF band ?
 
I=E2=80=99ll be listening = WSPR 2 and WSPR 15,=20 each evening from march 22 to 31. QTR 1730 =E2=80=93 1830 TU. QRG = 474.200 kHz USB. I=20 think that testing the WSPR 15 be a good idea=E2=80=A6
 
Using a special RX antenna = : 40 =E2=80=93 100 =E2=80=93=20 40 feet EWE antenna on 75=C2=B0 azimuth.
 
The best = windows for=20 receiving WSPR 2 here are : 1610-1630, 1670-1690 and 1770-1790 Hz. For = WSPR 15=20 it is 1815 + / - 3 Hertz.
 
Again : here not = transmitting, only=20 receiving on MF.
 
Best 73.
 
Andy F6CNI.=20 JN19QB.
 
------=_NextPart_000_0010_01CE271E.06919770--