Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8D063380000E1; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:09:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ULzFm-00044O-2R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 17:07:42 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ULzFl-00044F-LA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 17:07:41 +0000 Received: from smtpa1.mediabeam.com ([194.25.41.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1ULzFj-0008Fy-E5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 17:07:40 +0000 Received: from IMAP1 (balancer7.mediabeam.com [10.100.1.80]) by smtpa1.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r2UH7HMG027456; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:07:17 +0100 Received: from [192.168.178.33] (188-195-84-36-dynip.superkabel.de [188.195.84.36] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtpa.mediabeam.com (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r2UH7G12027426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:07:17 +0100 X-mediaBEAM-Originating-IP: [188.195.84.36] X-mediaBEAM-AUTHID: [DK1IS@kabelmail.de] Message-ID: <51571BED.6000508@kabelmail.de> Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:07:57 +0100 From: DK1IS User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org, rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Dear group, to whom it may concern: several stations are using GPS modules to stabilize their main oscillators - so did I since about 3 years by injecting the 10-kHz-signal from a Rockwell Jupiter TU30-D145 GPS module as an external standard into my HF transceiver TS950SD. Some weeks ago I was astonished to see my transmit frequency on a remote SDR being about 150 Hz too high at 28 MHz. Checking the 10-kHz-signal by a rubidium controlled counter showed a deviation of +40 ... 60 mHz. At the same time I realized that the 1-Hz-LED on the Jupiter was no longer acustically coincident to the 1-s-click of the DCF77 radiocontrolled analog clock in the shack which has always been the case in the past. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.25.41.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: LF: EMC Problems with Jupiter GPS Module Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618651571c2f55fd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear group, to whom it may concern: several stations are using GPS modules to stabilize their main oscillators - so did I since about 3 years by injecting the 10-kHz-signal from a Rockwell Jupiter TU30-D145 GPS module as an external standard into my HF transceiver TS950SD. Some weeks ago I was astonished to see my transmit frequency on a remote SDR being about 150 Hz too high at 28 MHz. Checking the 10-kHz-signal by a rubidium controlled counter showed a deviation of +40 ... 60 mHz. At the same time I realized that the 1-Hz-LED on the Jupiter was no longer acustically coincident to the 1-s-click of the DCF77 radiocontrolled analog clock in the shack which has always been the case in the past. After a lot of tests I found a solution for this problem by adding snap-on-ferrites at both ends of the GPS antenna line (abt 3m), the +5-V-power supply line (abt 1m) and at both ends of the 10-kHz-output line to the transceiver (abt 6m). Now the 10-kHz-signal is well between +/- 0.5 x 10 exp -9 again as it shoud be. Perhaps the increasing use of PLC and WLAN in the neighborhood (which makes increasing problems at receiving) was the reason for the trouble which could be eliminated by this simple procedure. If you use such GPS modules its a good idea to check the output frequency on occasion. 73, Tom, DK1IS http://www.qrz.com/db/dk1is