Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 016C1380000FB; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 06:33:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UIcnT-0007dJ-Jx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:32:35 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UIcnT-0007dA-3r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:32:35 +0000 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UIcnN-0005Ic-GB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:32:34 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAALHSlFOln7C/2dsb2JhbAANN8U7gW+DGAEBAQEDOEEMBBQIBAEBAQkWDwkDAgECAT0IEwEFAgEBtzmTNY1ggSULBwYQgyoDlmCUDIFz X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,884,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="569675777" Received: from host-78-150-126-194.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.126.194]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2013 10:32:07 +0000 Message-ID: <514AE1A3.9040009@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:32:03 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org CC: Henrique Pessoa References: <51488378.7030901@princeton.edu> <5148C475.8020502@broadpark.no> <5149F751.6040300@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130320-1, 20/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Henrique / LF Looking at the Avast Forum last night, they said they were continually working on false positives for win32evo-gen-susp-virus. This morning after Avast updated its definitions I deleted and re-installed WSPR-X v0.8, necessary because wsprd had been quarantined, and all is well, there was not even a warning from Avast. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: LF: Avast and WSPR-X v0.8 r3058 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da609514ae212266b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Henrique / LF Looking at the Avast Forum last night, they said they were continually working on false positives for win32evo-gen-susp-virus. This morning after Avast updated its definitions I deleted and re-installed WSPR-X v0.8, necessary because wsprd had been quarantined, and all is well, there was not even a warning from Avast. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 20/03/2013 20:07, Henrique Pessoa wrote: > > Eddie, your mail awakened my AVAST who gave me a warning and bloked > the file > I hope he is wrong! HI > Henrique > _ _ . . . . . . _ _ > > CT1HX > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 5:52 PM > Subject: Re: LF: Cross posting From wsjtgroup WSPR-X v0.8 r3058 > > >> Installed WSPR-X v0.8 this afternoon. >> >> I am sure someone said they had no decodes with it, then said OK now. I >> have no decodes, does anyone else get Back Door Virus Warnings too? >> See Att. >> >> Eddie G3ZJO >> >> >> > > >