Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AEDBF38000084; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:54:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UHjRW-0000Y8-Ec for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:26:14 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UHjRW-0000Xz-2L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:26:14 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UHjRU-00042r-Eh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:26:12 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r2INPpMr011376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:25:51 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r2INPpxB031944 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:25:51 +0100 Message-ID: <5147A27A.3060402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 00:25:46 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5147937E.3010809@dj7ka.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks to all reporting stations. I've updated the text several times ;-) I'll run it over the night and would be interested what the widest distance might be :-) 73,GN, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-2.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.8 UPPERCASE_50_75 message body is 50-75% uppercase X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: Re: LF: to DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=UPPERCASE_50_75 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41195147a9337110 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks to all reporting stations. I've updated the text several times ;-) I'll run it over the night and would be interested what the widest distance might be :-) 73,GN, Stefan/DK7FC Am 18.03.2013 23:35, schrieb SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios: > Hi Stefan > NAVTEX reception on KM07JS > > VVV > > TEST TEST TEST NAVTEX BEACON DE DK7FC DK7FC DK7FC > LOCATOR: JN49IK KN49IK JN49IK > QTH: HEIDELBERG HEIDELBERG H IDRMRGLSTEFAN STEFAN > TX: HOMEMADE CLASS-D PA RUNNING ABOUT 50W FROM A 12V SUPPLY > ANT: INV-)80M UP AND 70M LONG > REPORTS WELCOME VIA RSGB LF REFEFRKSHEEP.ORG). > TNXNF_A0RDT, G3GMS, PA3FNY, ,8(2GFGBNBNX4DLTL DG3LV > G4WGT, DF2JP, G0NBD, D!UO, G32:?? DJ7KAKA73 73 73 7373 > )NNNN > > > Spiros/SV8CS