Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mi06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 98D08380000AB; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:58:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UHg63-0006oT-6T for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:51:51 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UHg62-0006oK-Qc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:51:50 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UHg61-0003Aa-9T for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:51:49 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2IJpmnC022278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:51:48 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r2IJpmxQ027108 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:51:48 +0100 Message-ID: <5147704F.7020402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:51:43 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Am 18.03.2013 20:21, schrieb Joe DF2JP: > [...] unfortunately im now qrv on LF not on MF > > 73 Joe > It is always the same, for me too :-) I'm seriously thinking about a HV switch to QSY from LF to MF and back. Many projects to do... [...] Content analysis details: (-4.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: LF: LF MF switch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b8e514771fd00de X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Am 18.03.2013 20:21, schrieb Joe DF2JP: > [...] unfortunately im now qrv on LF not on MF > > 73 Joe > It is always the same, for me too :-) I'm seriously thinking about a HV switch to QSY from LF to MF and back. Many projects to do... 73, Stefan/DK7FC