Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8EC26380000AB; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:24:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UHbW0-0004if-MC for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:58:20 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UHbW0-0004iW-6K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:58:20 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UHbVx-0001tQ-V1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:58:19 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r2IEvuPa007720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:57:56 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r2IEvumE018924 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:57:56 +0100 Message-ID: <51472B6F.2090509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:57:51 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3309.377f234c.3e76743b@aol.com> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Roelof, A spontaneous speculation: -Higher phase changes on HF and 160m (?) -Most WSPR RX stns on HF and 160m use HF TRXs which could have a higher drift than many SDRs on MF and LF -Same applies for the generation of WSPR signals (drift issue) -More stations with high SNR in the same 200 Hz BW on HF and 160m [...] Content analysis details: (-3.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 290c8768709872f914a4ca71ad6bfe49 Subject: Re: LF: WSPR -2 SNR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4081514731b677f2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Roelof, A spontaneous speculation: -Higher phase changes on HF and 160m (?) -Most WSPR RX stns on HF and 160m use HF TRXs which could have a higher drift than many SDRs on MF and LF -Same applies for the generation of WSPR signals (drift issue) -More stations with high SNR in the same 200 Hz BW on HF and 160m and so on ;-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 18.03.2013 15:07, schrieb Roelof Bakker: > Hello all, > > On the WSPR website, > > http://physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wspr.html > > I find this statement: > >>>> The program can decode signals with S/N as low as -28 dB in a 2500 >>>> Hz bandwidth. <<< > > I have been looking at decodes on WSPR Spots > > http://wsprnet.org/olddb > > and it appears that on bands from 160 m and up a SNR smaller than -25 > dB is a bit rare. > On 630 m these low level decodes are found more often, though decodes > with an SNR of -30 are rare. > > In the nigh of Saturday to Sunday, I had 14 decodes from WG2XJM. > Two of these showed a SNR of -33 dB. > I have never seen such a low SNR before and a search through the WSPR > Spots database showed a decode from a French listener of WG2XJM with > an SNR of -31, which is the lowest SNR I could find. > > As far as I know the bandwidth of the WSPR decoder is set to 200 Hz, > so as long as the receiver bandwidth is larger than 200 Hz, decoding > should not be effected. My receiver bandwidth is 540 Hz. > > So, has anyone an idea what is the cause of these low level WSPR decodes. > > Best regards, > Roelof Bakker, pa0rdrt