Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CE2C038000142; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 04:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UHUjz-0003qY-C0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:44:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UHUjy-0003qP-Nh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:44:18 +0000 Received: from alinga.sron.nl ([131.211.40.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UHUjx-0000Hx-0N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 07:44:17 +0000 Received: by localhost.sron.nl (TUNIX/Firewall Mail Server) with ESMTP id 3B675F7530 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:43:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by alinga.sron.nl (TUNIX/Firewall Mail Server) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:43:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by filter.sron.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2B0523A6051; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:43:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from gw1.sron.nl (gw1.sron.nl [172.16.40.26]) by filter.sron.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E62A3A6040 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:43:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from SRON-MTA by gw1.sron.nl with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:43:46 +0100 Message-Id: <5146D3BB020000FA000191AC@gw1.sron.nl> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 8.0.2 Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 08:43:39 +0100 From: "Victor van Kooten" To: References: <1363556204.88186.YahooMailNeo@web133105.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <514640F0.8060208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <514640F0.8060208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Stefan, never worked on a vessel but navtex is an interesting mode, received stations from Florida and New Orleans... However I only get good decodes when the signal is audible in a 350Hz filter.So I think qrss3 and higher and wspr2 are far superior... [...] Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: d7fcd9b75df8d1b09ddef9df028bd9ae Subject: Re: LF: Ham Navtex report Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=LINES_OF_YELLING, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60cc5146cbb30b81 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Stefan, never worked on a vessel but navtex is an interesting mode, received stations from Florida and New Orleans... However I only get good decodes when the signal is audible in a 350Hz filter.So I think qrss3 and higher and wspr2 are far superior... 73 GL Victor PA3FNY >>> Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer 17-3-2013 23:17 >>> Hello Mike/G3GMS and Mauro/IK2GFT, Victor/PA3FNY and Roelof/PA0RDT, Mani thanks for your reports on my NAVTEX test transmission. I'm glad to=20 see such an interest and i didn't know that there is a NAVTEX DX group :-) Very interesting. Have you all been radio operators on vessels in the=20 past or presence? Would you think that this mode is suitable for MF amateur radio=20 communication during high QRN times? If there is more interest, maybe by other listeners in that NAVTEX DX=20 group, i could run the beacon a bit longer. Any suggestions what information is missed in the beacon text? Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 17.03.2013 22:36, schrieb Mike Thayne: > Hello Stefan, > Your very good NAVTEX signal received here in Whitley Bay, ENG > IO95gb > 73 > Mike Thayne > g3gms > 2013-03-17 21:19:04> ZCZC ZI46 > 2013-03-17 21:19:04> > 2013-03-17 21:19:05> VVV > 2013-03-17 21:19:05> > 2013-03-17 21:19:14> TEST TEST TEST NAVTEX BEACON DE DK7FC DK7FC DK7FC > 2013-03-17 21:19:19> LOCATOR: JN49IK JN49IK JN49IK > 2013-03-17 21:19:24> QTH: H{}G HEIDELBERG HEIDELBERG > 2013-03-17 21:19:29> OP: STEFAN STEFAN STEFAN > 2013-03-17 21:19:38> TX: HOMEMADE CLASS-D PA RUNNING ABOUT 50W FROM A > 12V SUPPLY > 2013-03-17 21:19:44> ANT: INV-L 30M UP AND 70M LONG > 2013-03-17 21:19:53> REPORTS WELCOME VIA RSGB LF REFLECTOR (AT=20 > BLACKSHEEP.ORG). > 2013-03-17 21:19:54> 73 73 73 73 > 2013-03-17 21:19:56> C > 2013-03-17 21:19:57> NNNN