Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9F67D3800016A; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:08:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UHG7T-0001Nm-EG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:07:35 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UHG7T-0001Nb-02 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:07:35 +0000 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UHG7R-0006PZ-37 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:07:33 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTP id <0MJT002FTBG0UT50@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:07:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.48.126.39]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTPA id <0MJT004UHBFYBI50@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:07:12 +0100 (CET) Message-id: <5145EA2E.8010300@broadpark.no> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:07:10 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51458FA8.7000907@broadpark.no> In-reply-to: X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Markus My IC-R75 (X-tal oven) is in REV CW mode and the pitch is 600Hz . My frequency scale is calibrated after the time station on 77.5KHz (599.90Hz in the waterfall). LA4ANA's beacon is 7.6Hz over the pitch freq in the waterfall. I hope I am not thinking 180 degrees wrong now, but this gives me 137787.6. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: c0336009bd9bab526ca27d297ea7579a Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: Re: LF: A CME hit this morning X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41175145ea794b1a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Markus My IC-R75 (X-tal oven) is in REV CW mode and the pitch is 600Hz . My frequency scale is calibrated after the time station on 77.5KHz (599.90Hz in the waterfall). LA4ANA's beacon is 7.6Hz over the pitch freq in the waterfall. I hope I am not thinking 180 degrees wrong now, but this gives me 137787.6. Markus, is it possible to estimate the hight of reflection layer , when you know the frequency and the doppler shift ? LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Den 17.03.2013 11:15, skrev Markus Vester: > Steinar, > > thanks for reporting this! The 0.1 Hz Doppler shift is remarkable. Is your frequency scale upright or inverted? > > On a several occasions a few years back, I observed still unexplained "ripples" on SXV 135.8 kHz, which seemed to indicate a delayed component with a similar-sized Doppler shift: > http://df6nm.bplaced.net/LF/sxv_ripples/sxv_ripples.htm > > What is strange is that according your screenshot the shifted trace appeared from 4:15 to 4:45 UT, whereas the Boulder magnetometer shows a magnetic disturbance starting not before at 6:00: > http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/rt_plots/bou_12h.html > > BTW I wonder if LA4ANA's beacon would be detectable on one of our 137780 Hz microHz grabbers here. Do you know his exact frequency, and whether the carrier is phase continuous? > > Best 73, > Markus > > > From: Steinar Aanesland > Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 10:40 AM > To: *rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: LF: A CME hit this morning > > > I think I picked it up with my 137Khz grabber. I am monitoring Robert > LA4ANA on 137780. It is ground wave between us, but I think I can see an > sky wave refection also when the storm hit the earth. What do you think? > > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/qrss60_multipath.jpg >