Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AAAAE38000089; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 09:24:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UHD6l-0000hu-6B for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:54:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UHD6k-0000hl-Nt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:54:38 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UHD6j-0005xC-1A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:54:37 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r2HCsGvq005314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:54:16 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r2HCsG9g030630 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:54:16 +0100 Message-ID: <5145BCF2.8010507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:54:10 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <3309.377f234c.3e76743b@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <3309.377f234c.3e76743b@aol.com> X-Spam-Score: -3.2 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Nicolas, Tnx for decoding me. 100% copy :-) Well i cannot see the advantage of this mode against RTTY, i.e. the improvements by the FEC. We will see in summer when the QRN is high. A proffessional test as done by W1VD (OP vs. WSPR) would be helpful. [...] Content analysis details: (-3.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 8ef270cc2ec30cd34b6313d7ada17a45 Subject: Re: LF: NAVTEX Beacon on 630m Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020907030202060102010608" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60185145c40e37e6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020907030202060102010608 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Nicolas, Tnx for decoding me. 100% copy :-) Well i cannot see the advantage of this mode against RTTY, i.e. the improvements by the FEC. We will see in summer when the QRN is high. A proffessional test as done by W1VD (OP vs. WSPR) would be helpful. At least the data rate is sufficient for a real QSO! I will go on in NAVTEX later in the afternoon. 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: What about the 630m allocation in France, any news? Am 17.03.2013 02:19, schrieb F4DTL@aol.com: > Hello Stefan, nice another mode on MF > 2013-03-17 01:14:27> VVV > 2013-03-17 01:14:36> TEST TEST TEST NAVTEX BEACON DE DK7FC DK7FC DK7FC > 2013-03-17 01:14:42> LOCATOR: JN49IK JN49IK JN49IK > 2013-03-17 01:14:47> QTH: HEIDELBERG HEIDELBERG HEIDELBERG > 2013-03-17 01:14:51> OP: STEFAN STEFAN STEFAN > 2013-03-17 01:15:01> TX: HOMEMADE CLASS-D PA RUNNING ABOUT 50W FROM A > 12V SUPPLY > 2013-03-17 01:15:06> ANT: INV-L 30M UP AND 70M LONG > 2013-03-17 01:15:15> REPORTS WELCOME VIA RSGB LF REFLECTOR (AT > BLACKSHEEP.ORG). > 2013-03-17 01:15:17> 73 73 73 73 > *F4DTL Nicolas* > *RX IC7400 & Miniwhip* > *Navtex soft decoder YAND* --------------020907030202060102010608 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Nicolas,

Tnx for decoding me. 100% copy :-)
Well i cannot see the advantage of this mode against RTTY, i.e. the improvements by the FEC. We will see in summer when the QRN is high. A proffessional test as done by W1VD (OP vs. WSPR) would be helpful.

At least the data rate is sufficient for a real QSO!

I will go on in NAVTEX later in the afternoon.

73, Stefan/DK7FC

PS: What about the 630m allocation in France, any news?



Am 17.03.2013 02:19, schrieb F4DTL@aol.com:
Hello Stefan, nice another mode on MF
 
2013-03-17 01:14:27> VVV
2013-03-17 01:14:36> TEST TEST TEST NAVTEX BEACON DE DK7FC DK7FC DK7FC
2013-03-17 01:14:42> LOCATOR: JN49IK JN49IK JN49IK
2013-03-17 01:14:47> QTH: HEIDELBERG HEIDELBERG HEIDELBERG
2013-03-17 01:14:51> OP: STEFAN STEFAN STEFAN
2013-03-17 01:15:01> TX: HOMEMADE CLASS-D PA RUNNING ABOUT 50W FROM A 12V SUPPLY
2013-03-17 01:15:06> ANT: INV-L 30M UP AND 70M LONG
2013-03-17 01:15:15> REPORTS WELCOME VIA RSGB LF REFLECTOR (AT BLACKSHEEP.ORG).
2013-03-17 01:15:17> 73 73 73 73
 
F4DTL Nicolas
RX IC7400 & Miniwhip
Navtex soft decoder YAND
--------------020907030202060102010608--