Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3408A380000A6; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 19:59:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UH0zR-0005xq-Gj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:58:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UH0zR-0005xh-3p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:58:17 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UH0y7-00049O-HJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 16 Mar 2013 23:58:16 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r2GNuEmL024571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:56:14 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r2GNuE5x004879 for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:56:14 +0100 Message-ID: <51450699.3010209@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 00:56:09 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <7229BB1361E742469FB9FBED2CCF8DE0@GaryAsus> <5144F6E5.80302@psk31.plus.com> <5144FAD8.3090108@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51450093.1030001@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <51450093.1030001@psk31.plus.com> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id r2GNuEmL024571 X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Eddie, Sorry for the confusion. It was (still) RTTY in the beginning. Now it's real NAVTEX in fldigi. And the QRG has changed again. The centre frequency is about 477.25 kHz now. The signal was to close to possible Opera signals near 478.5 kHz so i went down a kHz... [...] Content analysis details: (-3.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -2.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: Re: LF: NAVTEX Beacon on 630m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61895145074b4cd6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Eddie, Sorry for the confusion. It was (still) RTTY in the beginning. Now it's=20 real NAVTEX in fldigi. And the QRG has changed again. The centre frequency is about 477.25 kHz=20 now. The signal was to close to possible Opera signals near 478.5 kHz so=20 i went down a kHz... I'll play arround with Twente SDR now here on another PC outside the shac= k. Now it should work stable (using a fan from the beginning now ;-) ). 73, Stefan Am 17.03.2013 00:30, schrieb g3zjo: > Hi Stefan > > Saw and heard your signal, its narrower than the Navtex on fldigi. Too=20 > late at night to work out why.:-) > > GN Eddie > > > On 16/03/2013 23:06, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: >> Gary, Eddie, >> >> OK, i will add another mode to test on MF this night. Will use NAVTEX=20 >> (generated in FLDIGI) somwhere arround 477.3 kHz. Coming soon (abt 10=20 >> min...). >> >> Reports apprechiated :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> PS: Yes the shift is 170 Hz but the band is pretty clean. Have spent=20 >> 2 hours in CW now. No one except NDBs, CW-, WSPR- and these few=20 >> tests-stations are active. >> >> >