Message-ID: <51419D5E.3050703@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:50:22 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <513E5241.40807@psk31.plus.com> <513E6015.30901@psk31.plus.com> <514092DF.3030500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5140E1AD.5030606@psk31.plus.com>
In-Reply-To: <5140E1AD.5030606@psk31.plus.com>
Subject: Re: LF: 630m Narrow Keyboard Mode
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------070505030202070502020300"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070505030202070502020300
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id r2E9oRWO030171

Eddie,

Am 13.03.2013 21:29, schrieb g3zjo:
> If I am around using GMFSK I will be on 476.100. Getting more people=20
> interested so that there is a possibility of random QSO's, err, I will=20
> leave that to you.
OK, i will follow the thread.

It could be useful to find a mode that allows 2 way communication in=20
summer, when the QRN crashes make CW operation not a pleasure. Just a=20
thought...
Ah yes, and the FEC stuff could help to jump over the QRN crashes, not=20
over the long and deep QSB of course.

73, Stefan



>
> 73 Eddie
>
> P.S. Mal, yes missing him already.
>
> PPS. I had my first QRSS3 QSO today with G4AYT 167Km daytime path, not=20
> random though.
>
>
>
> On 13/03/2013 14:53, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote:
>> Hi Eddie, LF/MF,
>>
>> I'm a bit confused in the last days by the number of various=20
>> digimodes which have been tested. Gary started with RTTY which is fun=20
>> and allows real QSOs on 630m, apart from CW. But if each mode is done=20
>> as a short test to check its performance, then it quickly becomes=20
>> boring. What i would like to have is a mode which is used by several=20
>> active amateurs, a real QSO mode like CW. A mode that lasts longer=20
>> than a day. I thought that AMTOR-FEC could be useful but i didn't=20
>> make any tests yet. However if i have to assume that there will be 2=20
>> or 3 interested QSO partners who will be available for a short test=20
>> QSO and then QSY to GADFDSMSFASKMDKFK-4 or whatever, then none of=20
>> these modes are actually interesting for me and i come back to CW=20
>> where i can be sure to find a QSO partner without announcing my=20
>> activity before. Today, tomorrow, next week and next year :-)
>>
>> What do you suggest? :-)
>>
>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>>
>> PS: And where is Mal? :-)
>>
>>
>> Am 11.03.2013 23:52, schrieb g3zjo:
>>> Sucess.
>>>
>>> Just a little more signal and this would have been a really good QSO=20
>>> over our path of 127Km conditions are not good tonight, my antenna=20
>>> current is down.
>>>
>>> Eddie
>>>
>>> On 11/03/2013 21:53, g3zjo wrote:
>>>> LF
>>>>
>>>> Searching for a Narrow Keyboard QSO mode suitable for QRP on 630m.=20
>>>> I went back to a program I used several years ago.
>>>>
>>>> Currently Testing GMFSK not to be confused with gMFSK which is a=20
>>>> Linux program.
>>>>
>>>> GMFSK is an FSK Mode using Varicode by JE3HHT Makoto Mori included=20
>>>> in MMVari.not new program it is of the usual high standard found in=20
>>>> his software.
>>>>
>>>> GMFSK has variable width, currently I am running at 15.625Hz wide.=20
>>>> 474.200 Dial 1900 tone frequency.
>>>>
>>>> JE3HHT provides fine documentation with his software, for some=20
>>>> reason all the other modes covered by MMVari are well covered but=20
>>>> when he gets to GMFSK he says that it is beyond the scope of the=20
>>>> instructions. I have yet to find more details about the mode.
>>>>
>>>> This Mode should be better than RTTY and faster MFSK for higher=20
>>>> power stations too.
>>>>
>>>> 73 Eddie G3ZJO
>>>>
>>>
>

--------------070505030202070502020300
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Eddie, <br>
<br>
Am 13.03.2013 21:29, schrieb g3zjo:
<blockquote cite="mid:5140E1AD.5030606@psk31.plus.com" type="cite">
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
If I am around using GMFSK I will be on 476.100. Getting more people
interested so that there is a possibility of random QSO's, err, I will
leave that to you. <br>
</blockquote>
OK, i will follow the thread.<br>
<br>
It could be useful to find a mode that allows 2 way communication in
summer, when the QRN crashes make CW operation not a pleasure. Just a
thought...<br>
Ah yes, and the FEC stuff could help to jump over the QRN crashes, not
over the long and deep QSB of course.<br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:5140E1AD.5030606@psk31.plus.com" type="cite"> <br>
73 Eddie<br>
  <br>
P.S. Mal, yes missing him already. <br>
  <br>
PPS. I had my first QRSS3 QSO today with G4AYT 167Km daytime path, not
random though.<br>
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
On 13/03/2013 14:53, Stefan Sch&auml;fer wrote:
  <blockquote cite="mid:514092DF.3030500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de"
 type="cite">
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
Hi Eddie, LF/MF,<br>
    <br>
I'm a bit confused in the last days by the number of various digimodes
which have been tested. Gary started with RTTY which is fun and allows
real QSOs on 630m, apart from CW. But if each mode is done as a short
test to check its performance, then it quickly becomes boring. What i
would like to have is a mode which is used by several active amateurs,
a real QSO mode like CW. A mode that lasts longer than a day. I thought
that AMTOR-FEC could be useful but i didn't make any tests yet. However
if i have to assume that there will be 2 or 3 interested QSO partners
who will be available for a short test QSO and then QSY to
GADFDSMSFASKMDKFK-4 or whatever, then none of these modes are actually
interesting for me and i come back to CW where i can be sure to find a
QSO partner without announcing my activity before. Today, tomorrow,
next week and next year :-)<br>
    <br>
What do you suggest? :-)<br>
    <br>
73, Stefan/DK7FC<br>
    <br>
PS: And where is Mal? :-)<br>
    <br>
    <br>
Am 11.03.2013 23:52, schrieb g3zjo:
    <blockquote cite="mid:513E6015.30901@psk31.plus.com" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
Sucess.<br>
      <br>
Just a little more signal and this would have been a really good QSO
over our path of 127Km conditions are not good tonight, my antenna
current is down.<br>
      <br>
Eddie<br>
      <br>
On 11/03/2013 21:53, g3zjo wrote:
      <blockquote cite="mid:513E5241.40807@psk31.plus.com" type="cite">
        <meta http-equiv="content-type"
 content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
        <span style="padding-bottom: 100px;">LF<br>
        <br>
Searching for a Narrow Keyboard QSO mode suitable for QRP on 630m. I
went back to a program I used several years ago.<br>
        <br>
Currently Testing GMFSK not to be confused with gMFSK which is a Linux
program.<br>
        <br>
GMFSK is an FSK Mode using Varicode by JE3HHT Makoto Mori included in
MMVari.not new program it is of the usual high standard found in his
software.<br>
        <br>
GMFSK has variable width, currently I am running at 15.625Hz wide.
474.200 Dial 1900 tone frequency.<br>
        <br>
JE3HHT provides fine documentation with his software, for some reason
all the other modes covered by MMVari are well covered but when h</span><span
 style="padding-bottom: 100px;"></span><span
 style="padding-bottom: 100px;">e gets</span><span
 style="padding-bottom: 100px;"></span><span
 style="padding-bottom: 100px;"> to GMFSK he says that it is beyond the
scope of the instructions. I have yet to find more details about the
mode. <br>
        <br>
        </span><span style="padding-bottom: 100px;">This Mode should be
better than RTTY and faster MFSK for higher power stations too.</span><br>
        <br>
73 Eddie G3ZJO<br>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
  <br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------070505030202070502020300--