Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 62BC6380000BE; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 09:09:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UEK5p-0000VN-6E for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:45:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UEK5o-0000VE-Pu for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:45:44 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UEK5m-00050c-VV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:45:43 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r29DjLHg011749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 14:45:21 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r29DjKmn022916 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 14:45:20 +0100 Message-ID: <513B3CEC.4010409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 14:45:16 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <513A0532.2080500@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <513A0532.2080500@gmx.de> X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hartmut, Maybe it has to do with your "callsign" DL-SWL. In the past i've read about similar problems. Try to use a real callsign like DE0TST, for a single upload test (is this already illegal?) If that works, then use DLSWL or so. I know from Edgar (Tasmania) that EJTSWL works, at least. [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: wspr15 decodes on 136kHz last night Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc149513b42b10888 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hartmut, Maybe it has to do with your "callsign" DL-SWL. In the past i've read about similar problems. Try to use a real callsign like DE0TST, for a single upload test (is this already illegal?) If that works, then use DLSWL or so. I know from Edgar (Tasmania) that EJTSWL works, at least. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 08.03.2013 16:35, schrieb Hartmut Wolff: > I still have problems with the upload to wsprnet. Here is what I > decoded last night: > > > 2130 -31 -0.2 0.137605 0 UA0AET NO65 37 > 2215 -26 0.8 0.137605 0 R7NT KN97 20 > 2330 -28 0.8 0.137605 0 R7NT KN97 20 > 0045 -20 0.4 0.137605 0 R7NT KN97 20 > 0315 -29 1.8 0.137605 0 R7NT KN97 20 >