Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4962638000086; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:15:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDeto-0000NZ-EI for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:46:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDeto-0000NQ-2L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:46:36 +0000 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDetm-0005w5-I4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:46:34 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAFnNOFFOlmQ+/2dsb2JhbAANNsFogmGBd4MgAQEBAQM4UQsJDwkWDwkDAgECAUUTCAEBsCKTDI8TFoMqA5ZLk3o X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,803,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="64863407" Received: from host-78-150-100-62.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.100.62]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2013 17:46:13 +0000 Message-ID: <5138D265.7010105@psk31.plus.com> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:46:13 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5138AF72.8000906@psk31.plus.com> <5138BF2A.6090008@psk31.plus.com> <5138D0BD.5070805@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <5138D0BD.5070805@broadpark.no> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130307-0, 07/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 07/03/2013 17:39, Steinar Aanesland wrote: > Eddie' > > Are you operating on the same freq? No I moved back to my MFSK4 frequency, did you want to try TX of JT9-x ? I will set up as soon as you let me know. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: ddae800c6581715278ab3184b42d46db Subject: Re: LF: JT9-2 TEST 474KHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404c5138d92b5e0a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror On 07/03/2013 17:39, Steinar Aanesland wrote: > Eddie' > > Are you operating on the same freq? No I moved back to my MFSK4 frequency, did you want to try TX of JT9-x ? I will set up as soon as you let me know. Eddie