Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D7090380000A2; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:38:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDbxD-0004i0-GF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:37:55 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDbxD-0004hr-1v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:37:55 +0000 Received: from eterpe-smout.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.16]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDbxA-0004mt-Gm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:37:53 +0000 Received: from ignis-smin.broadpark.no ([80.202.8.11]) by eterpe-smout.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTP id <0MJA0097VOMIB2D0@eterpe-smout.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:37:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([84.48.126.39]) by ignis-smin.broadpark.no (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTPA id <0MJA003W4OMHQDP0@ignis-smin.broadpark.no> for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:37:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 15:37:29 +0100 From: Steinar Aanesland In-reply-to: <51389F1C.4030408@psk31.plus.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-id: <5138A629.2060004@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 References: <5137C5F4.60500@broadpark.no> <5137D595.7030403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51386F9F.8090607@broadpark.no> <51389F1C.4030408@psk31.plus.com> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes Eddie, I will do :) LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Den 07.03.2013 15:07, skrev g3zjo: > Sorry Steinar > > I wasn't thinking, all these mode experiments.:-) > > Can you use 474.200 dial and a tone freq to put JT9-2 just below WSPR as > we did previously. > > 73 Eddie > > On 07/03/2013 10:44, Steinar Aanesland wrote: >> As you probably know Joe has released the ver 0.5, r3038 of WSJT-X. >> What I really want to try is some JT9 (-2 or -5) contacts on 630m :) >> >> LA5VNA Steinar >> >> >> >> >> >> loc:JO59jq >> >> >> Den 07.03.2013 00:47, skrev Stefan Schäfer: >>> Thanks for the links Steinar. Also to Jay/W1VD. >>> >>> And thanks all for an active day! Here and on the band(s). >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>> >>> PS: What will we do tomorrow? :-) >>> >>> Am 06.03.2013 23:40, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> If you want to compare digital modes , take a look at this document : >>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/Path%20%20Sim.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> Anthony Bombardiere, K2MO are using this Path Simulator >>>> by Moe Wheatley, AE4JY : >>>> http://www.moetronix.com/ae4jy/pathsim.htm >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [80.202.8.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 9d01e9df836df8dd3868645661e1c1f7 Subject: Re: LF: Compare digital modes Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b955138a67c1d0a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Yes Eddie, I will do :) LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Den 07.03.2013 15:07, skrev g3zjo: > Sorry Steinar >=20 > I wasn't thinking, all these mode experiments.:-) >=20 > Can you use 474.200 dial and a tone freq to put JT9-2 just below WS= PR as > we did previously. >=20 > 73 Eddie >=20 > On 07/03/2013 10:44, Steinar Aanesland wrote: >> As you probably know Joe has released the ver 0.5, r3038 of WSJT= -X. >> What I really want to try is some JT9 (-2 or -5) contacts on 630m= :) >> >> LA5VNA Steinar >> >> >> >> >> >> loc:JO59jq >> >> >> Den 07.03.2013 00:47, skrev Stefan Sch=E4fer: >>> Thanks for the links Steinar. Also to Jay/W1VD. >>> >>> And thanks all for an active day! Here and on the band(s). >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>> >>> PS: What will we do tomorrow? :-) >>> >>> Am 06.03.2013 23:40, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> If you want to compare digital modes , take a look at this docum= ent : >>>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/Path%20%20Sim.pdf >>>> >>>> >>>> Anthony Bombardiere, K2MO are using this Path Simulator >>>> by Moe Wheatley, AE4JY : >>>> http://www.moetronix.com/ae4jy/pathsim.htm >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20