Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2A362380000A7; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 18:49:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDO43-0001Mv-1n for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 23:48:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDO42-0001Mm-Ly for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 23:48:02 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDO40-0001XB-Pe for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 23:48:01 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r26Nld91005947 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:47:40 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r26Nlc9E023292 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:47:38 +0100 Message-ID: <5137D595.7030403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 00:47:33 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5137C5F4.60500@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <5137C5F4.60500@broadpark.no> X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks for the links Steinar. Also to Jay/W1VD. And thanks all for an active day! Here and on the band(s). 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-1.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [129.206.100.212 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: Compare digital modes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618a5137d6084cb1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks for the links Steinar. Also to Jay/W1VD. And thanks all for an active day! Here and on the band(s). 73, Stefan/DK7FC PS: What will we do tomorrow? :-) Am 06.03.2013 23:40, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: > Hi all > > If you want to compare digital modes , take a look at this document : > https://dl.dropbox.com/u/16381257/Path%20%20Sim.pdf > > > Anthony Bombardiere, K2MO are using this Path Simulator > by Moe Wheatley, AE4JY : > http://www.moetronix.com/ae4jy/pathsim.htm > >