Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 10817380000AF; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 16:47:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDLgI-0006Ay-3U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:15:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDLgH-0006Ap-MV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:15:21 +0000 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDLgG-0000iz-2B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:15:20 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAGKuN1FOl8iZ/2dsb2JhbAANN8Q4gXODHgEBAQEDOFELCQgEAQEBCRYPCQMCAQIBPQgTBgIBAbBLk2mPARIWgyoDlkuTeQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,797,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="64757346" Received: from host-78-151-200-153.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.151.200.153]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2013 21:14:59 +0000 Message-ID: <5137B1D1.2000609@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:14:57 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51378EC1.5030309@psk31.plus.com> <5137970B.6060600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51379FA1.1040308@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <9F2D8D74F7F0410FADCEFDF26F664846@AGB> <2295BF6FEF9C47109A86F3F7081209A2@SV8CSHP> <5137ABAE.1030505@psk31.plus.com> <466E02F602104403B2435743DB94E7B0@AGB> In-Reply-To: <466E02F602104403B2435743DB94E7B0@AGB> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130306-0, 06/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Those two are overlapping, well the wide one overlaps the narrow.:-( . Not much good for either one would think. Ed On 06/03/2013 21:04, Graham wrote: > Yes , first mistake was picking 50 baud as most ham-progs > are looking for 45.45 > > there is some wide 180 shift LF of Stefan , not printed > anything yet lost in the ' In the shuffling madness' > as JT would say > > G. > > > From: "g3zjo" > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 8:48 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: 478.200 RTTY > >> Hi Spiros >> >> There seem to be several stations and several un announced modes now >> on air. >> >> I am hopefully in the clear above Stefan testing MFSK4 now. >> >> MFSK4 is on Fldigi Software, needs accurate tuning but not as >> critical as CMFSK8. >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> >> On 06/03/2013 20:26, SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios wrote: >>> Just received only this: >>> R RSGB LF REFLRCTOR CGAT) BLAKSHEEP.86,' >>> >>> Who is TXing RTTY now? >>> Spiros/SV8CS >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: Re: LF: 478.200 RTTY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4acf5137b97b1189 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Those two are overlapping, well the wide one overlaps the narrow.:-( . Not much good for either one would think. Ed On 06/03/2013 21:04, Graham wrote: > Yes , first mistake was picking 50 baud as most ham-progs > are looking for 45.45 > > there is some wide 180 shift LF of Stefan , not printed > anything yet lost in the ' In the shuffling madness' > as JT would say > > G. > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "g3zjo" > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 8:48 PM > To: > Subject: Re: LF: 478.200 RTTY > >> Hi Spiros >> >> There seem to be several stations and several un announced modes now >> on air. >> >> I am hopefully in the clear above Stefan testing MFSK4 now. >> >> MFSK4 is on Fldigi Software, needs accurate tuning but not as >> critical as CMFSK8. >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> >> On 06/03/2013 20:26, SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios wrote: >>> Just received only this: >>> R RSGB LF REFLRCTOR CGAT) BLAKSHEEP.86,' >>> >>> Who is TXing RTTY now? >>> Spiros/SV8CS >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >