Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6D6C5380000D3; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:54:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDJtT-0003Pv-Js for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:20:51 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDJtT-0003Pm-7b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:20:51 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDJtR-0008S9-Jn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 19:20:50 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r26JKmGK027411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 20:20:48 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r26JKjE2016122 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 20:20:45 +0100 Message-ID: <5137970B.6060600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 20:20:43 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51378EC1.5030309@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <51378EC1.5030309@psk31.plus.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Eddie, Yes, very interesting. Jan/PA3ABK told me that AMTOR-FEC is the same as NAVTEX. A quick google search and wikipedia check confirmed that :-) NAVTEX is available in FLDIGI as well, which is fine :-) I also installed Multipsk now and managed to decode my RTTY (from Twente) even with that program. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 87966b345956c8ef3389b993f6a18f4e Subject: Re: LF: RTTY 478.xxx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408151379f111915 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Hello Eddie, Yes, very interesting. Jan/PA3ABK told me that AMTOR-FEC is the same as NAVTEX. A quick google search and wikipedia check confirmed that :-) NAVTEX is available in FLDIGI as well, which is fine :-) I also installed Multipsk now and managed to decode my RTTY (from Twente) even with that program. Now i would like to try NAVTEX. Will change to that mode now... 73, Stefan Am 06.03.2013 19:45, schrieb g3zjo: > Hi LF > > I am continuing to test RTTY below 478.200 reports very welcome. > > PA3ABK came up very nicely in QSO with DK7FC. > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO