Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BD10A380000E8 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 12:57:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDHse-0001q6-Ks for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:11:52 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDHse-0001pu-8I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:11:52 +0000 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDHsY-000810-Va for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:11:51 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBACV4N1ECZMUt/2dsb2JhbAANN8RGgXCDHQEBAQEDOE0ECwkIBAEBAQkWDwkDAgECAT0IEwYCAQGxRJNhjVuBCxsSBhCDKgOWS5N4gXI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,795,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="402128379" Received: from host-2-100-197-45.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.197.45]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2013 17:10:35 +0000 Message-ID: <5137788A.8070608@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:10:34 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5137565D.6080705@psk31.plus.com> <86D11602C2A24889B8E03DBCA49C73AD@IBM7FFA209F07C> In-Reply-To: <86D11602C2A24889B8E03DBCA49C73AD@IBM7FFA209F07C> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130306-0, 06/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Chris They are all live for direct, possibly talktalk in preference. 73 Eddie [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Testing RTTY 478.200kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d6055513783a50e5c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Hi Chris They are all live for direct, possibly talktalk in preference. 73 Eddie On 06/03/2013 16:49, Chris wrote: > Hi Eddie, > Which e-mail address? > My address book has you @talktalk, > QRZ.COM says @npton, > your mail to here is @psk31 ?? > Chris, G4AYT. > ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 2:44 PM > Subject: LF: Testing RTTY 478.200kHz > > >> With the interest in RTTY at this time I wonder if we have any 'eyes' >> within RX range of me. I am currently testing RTTY on 478.200KHz also >> in the Fldigi software is MFSK4 I shall swap to that also at times. >> >> For a specific transmission at please contact me. >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> > >