Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6B70A3800009F; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:28:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDGxP-0000W0-IM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:12:43 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDGxP-0000Vq-4h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:12:43 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDGxN-0007a3-Ji for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:12:42 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r26GCe4c029332 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:12:41 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r26GCdtc010368 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:12:39 +0100 Message-ID: <51376AF3.9040409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 17:12:35 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51371E11.6020502@psk31.plus.com> <513746F3.7090508@psk31.plus.com> <84B77AD08F5F42849E6492B9048EC349@IBM7FFA209F07C> <51375C40.6050501@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <513761CD.8070107@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <513761CD.8070107@psk31.plus.com> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id r26GCe4c029332 X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Eddie, Yes, i can try. However i have no idea if it will be "better". Not an expert on the subject. What i like is such a fast mode like RTTY, maybe 40 Baud would be fine as well, but not much slower and no limited number of characters. I like the function to just write down and the program sends it immediately :-) So if there is another mode that has some error correction, it would be an improvement i think. And AMTOR has it, if i understood correctly. So what the hell is MFSK-4? Yes, Multi-Frequency-Shift-Keying with 4 tones, fine. But what does it offer? We can just try but i would like to understand at least basically what i'm doing. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 33d261536bb1467bb13d5764461d5ec4 Subject: Re: LF: RTTY vs.MFSK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b9851376e913afb X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Eddie, Yes, i can try. However i have no idea if it will be "better". Not an=20 expert on the subject. What i like is such a fast mode like RTTY, maybe 40 Baud would be fine=20 as well, but not much slower and no limited number of characters. I like=20 the function to just write down and the program sends it immediately :-) So if there is another mode that has some error correction, it would be=20 an improvement i think. And AMTOR has it, if i understood correctly. So what the hell is MFSK-4? Yes, Multi-Frequency-Shift-Keying with 4=20 tones, fine. But what does it offer? We can just try but i would like to=20 understand at least basically what i'm doing. I will now switch to MFSK-4, same QRG. 73, Stefan Am 06.03.2013 16:33, schrieb g3zjo: > Hi Stefan > > On 06/03/2013 15:09, Stefan Sch=C3=A4fer wrote: >> Eddie, Gary, Chris, Minto, MF, >> >> I've read a bit about RTTY and AMTOR in Wikipedia. Maybe AMTOR would=20 >> help us a bit more, even when not used in that ARQ mode but also in=20 >> beacon stile, due to the FEC? >> > MultiPSK has AMTOR with FEC, yes we don't want ARQ do we. I have run=20 > it, same width as RTTY the FEC may help but its just as fast it is QSO=20 > mode. > > Again I will ask the question, why is MFSK not being considered I am=20 > running it at the moment on 478.200. MFSK4 is on Fldigi can you try it=20 > now.? > > Eddie >> Eddie, what was the name of the program that offers that mode for=20 >> free? I cannot find your recent email where you already mentioned it. >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> >