Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 00B7D38000094; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:52:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDGO5-0008GE-Mh for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:36:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDGO5-0008Fw-AH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:36:13 +0000 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDGO3-0007Lv-Q4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:36:12 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAOhhN1ECZMUt/2dsb2JhbAANN8RFgXCDHQEBAQEDOE0ECwkIBAEBAQkWDwkDAgECAT0IEwYCAQGxaJNcjwESBhCDKgOWS5N4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,795,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="402115670" Received: from host-2-100-197-45.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.197.45]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2013 15:35:49 +0000 Message-ID: <51376254.9000502@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 15:35:48 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5137565D.6080705@psk31.plus.com> <409F001BFEB6496BB8D1681C1AA9D79B@PcMinto> In-Reply-To: <409F001BFEB6496BB8D1681C1AA9D79B@PcMinto> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130306-0, 06/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 06/03/2013 15:15, Minto Witteveen wrote: > Receiving anything at my QTH would be a miracle (lots of QRM). > I cannot detect your signal on Twente WebSDR either.. > 73's Minto pa3bca > > It would be a real miracle Minto:-) [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 2e2f7cbbe9f38dd7bf3fac4fc012e6fc Subject: Re: LF: Testing RTTY 478.200kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b995137662501b1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none On 06/03/2013 15:15, Minto Witteveen wrote: > Receiving anything at my QTH would be a miracle (lots of QRM). > I cannot detect your signal on Twente WebSDR either.. > 73's Minto pa3bca > > It would be a real miracle Minto:-) Eddie > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Ceterum censeo Carthaginem delendam esse > -----Original Message----- From: g3zjo Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 > 15:44 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Testing RTTY > 478.200kHz > With the interest in RTTY at this time I wonder if we have any 'eyes' > within RX range of me. I am currently testing RTTY on 478.200KHz also > in the Fldigi software is MFSK4 I shall swap to that also at times. > > For a specific transmission at please contact me. > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO > >