Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E793B380000AE; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 14:56:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UCxxO-0005Kr-St for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:55:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UCxxO-0005Ki-Dw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:55:26 +0000 Received: from out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UCxxM-0002K6-Ko for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:55:25 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsEDAHpMNlECZMuP/2dsb2JhbAANN4hjhVuDMLJzBAGCA4MeAQEBAQMjZgsEBQgEAQEBCRYIAwICCQMCAQIBNAkIEwYCAQGIG6kHcYJAkByOB3sRARaCF4ETA5ZKk3Y X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,790,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="567838381" Received: from host-2-100-203-143.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([2.100.203.143]) by out1.ip06ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2013 19:55:03 +0000 Message-ID: <51364D95.7090009@psk31.plus.com> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:55:01 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <58DDEF66BD1F4FCDA781E159BB3130D4@GaryAsus> <5133BADE.9070906@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5133C67A.10300@psk31.plus.com> <5133C9E6.5070406@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5133D161.4080703@psk31.plus.com> <5134A7AB.6020202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5134F966.5090807@psk31.plus.com> <5135D5E8.7040304@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5135FDDC.2020100@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1AD9CFA88EB9476B81C3CD9EE515BB31@PcMinto> <51362618.2040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51364368.3090204@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130305-0, 05/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 05/03/2013 19:43, Graham wrote: > Is the shift reversed ? > G.. ?? No. Ed > > *From:* g3zjo > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:11 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission > > Also Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/lfgrabber.html > > Wide View, showing your signal. > > Eddie > > On 05/03/2013 17:06, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> Minto, >> >> I'm excited. Was that you a few minutes ago? >> I was writing in real time some stuff to my program which sent the >> stuff in RTTY immediately. The TX was in idle mode during that time. >> suddenly someone answered! "big brother is watching you" and so. Was >> that you?? >> It looks like my PA is blown up once again. It is simply not designed >> for a key-down transmission, so the idle mode is not ideal, except >> i'm using a fan. Now i will once again replace 2x IRFZ48N and be on >> air in 1 hour or earlier. Let us try the QSO then again, OK? :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC > [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 027eb28428a0ed4e20e06b28d08cfc7b Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010508050708070702000303" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618851364ddb7c2b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010508050708070702000303 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 05/03/2013 19:43, Graham wrote: > Is the shift reversed ? > G.. ?? No. Ed > > *From:* g3zjo > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:11 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission > > Also Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/lfgrabber.html > > Wide View, showing your signal. > > Eddie > > On 05/03/2013 17:06, Stefan Schäfer wrote: >> Minto, >> >> I'm excited. Was that you a few minutes ago? >> I was writing in real time some stuff to my program which sent the >> stuff in RTTY immediately. The TX was in idle mode during that time. >> suddenly someone answered! "big brother is watching you" and so. Was >> that you?? >> It looks like my PA is blown up once again. It is simply not designed >> for a key-down transmission, so the idle mode is not ideal, except >> i'm using a fan. Now i will once again replace 2x IRFZ48N and be on >> air in 1 hour or earlier. Let us try the QSO then again, OK? :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC > --------------010508050708070702000303 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 05/03/2013 19:43, Graham wrote:
Is the  shift  reversed ?
 
G..

?? No.

Ed

From: g3zjo
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RTTY test transmission

Also Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/lfgrabber.html

Wide View, showing your signal.

Eddie

On 05/03/2013 17:06, Stefan Schäfer wrote:
Minto,

I'm excited. Was that you a few minutes ago?
I was writing in real time some stuff to my program which sent the stuff in RTTY immediately. The TX was in idle mode during that time. suddenly someone answered! "big brother is watching you" and so. Was that you??
It looks like my PA is blown up once again. It is simply not designed for a key-down transmission, so the idle mode is not ideal, except i'm using a fan. Now i will once again replace 2x IRFZ48N and be on air in 1 hour or earlier. Let us try the QSO then again, OK? :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


--------------010508050708070702000303--