Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 76B2B380000B1; Sun, 3 Mar 2013 05:43:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UC6NW-0000rO-I7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:42:50 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UC6NW-0000rF-45 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:42:50 +0000 Received: from out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.239]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UC6NT-0005bg-H1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:42:48 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAHwJM1FOlnIm/2dsb2JhbAANN8JJgRKDEgEBAQEDOE0ECwkIBAEBAQkWDwkDAgECAT0IEwYCAQG2LZI3jxISBhCDKgOWRpN0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,772,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="416088763" Received: from host-78-150-114-38.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([78.150.114.38]) by out1.ip03ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2013 10:42:26 +0000 Message-ID: <51332912.4030700@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:42:26 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <0F04723C34E2473DA009EE93C16FAED1@GaryAsus> In-Reply-To: <0F04723C34E2473DA009EE93C16FAED1@GaryAsus> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130302-1, 02/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Gary No no, lets use 85KHz :-) Well I can do 45/85 now but quite agree 50/85 is far more universal. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Scan-Signature: 42bbe44aa18353e845a65753486d556c Subject: Re: LF: Re: CMSFK8 success Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b995133296b2e12 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : temperror Hi Gary No no, lets use 85KHz :-) Well I can do 45/85 now but quite agree 50/85 is far more universal. Question now is when. Eddie On 03/03/2013 10:34, Gary - G4WGT wrote: > Hi LF, > > I wrote ...... with 85 kHz shift. > > Of course should be 85 Hz. > > 73, Gary. > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary - G4WGT" > To: ; > Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2013 10:26 AM > Subject: Re: LF: Re: CMSFK8 success > > >> Hi Eddie & Graham, LF, >> >> OK comments re: 50 baud.... >> >> It was a mistake to set for 45 baud as several programs which include >> RTTY mode cannot be set for 45 bd...... >> >> Future transmissions will be using 50 baud with 85 kHz shift on >> 478.200 kHz centre frequency. >> >> Sorry for the confusion. >> >> 73, >> >> Gary - G4WGT. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" >> To: >> Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 10:30 PM >> Subject: Re: LF: Re: CMSFK8 success >> >> >>> FB Gary >>> >>> Playing finished for tonight. >>> >>> BTW I could only see that MultiPSK can do 85Hz at 50Baud not 45Baud. >>> >>> 73 Eddie >>> >>> On 02/03/2013 21:57, Gary - G4WGT wrote: >>>> OK Eddie, >>>> >>>> I am going downstairs myself at 10pm. >>>> >>>> I will be on again tomorrow night. >>>> >>>> 73, >>>> >>>> Gary. >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" >>>> To: >>>> Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 9:51 PM >>>> Subject: Re: LF: Re: CMSFK8 success >>>> >>>> >>>>> No signal. I am set up for WSPR so dial 474.200KHz >>>>> >>>>> Let me know if you want some more, I am just showing my face in >>>>> the lounge at the moment.:-) >>>>> >>>>> Eddie >>>>> >>>>> On 02/03/2013 21:20, Gary - G4WGT wrote: >>>>>> Eddie, >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> on 475.500KHz. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this dial frequency ?? >>>>>> >>>>>> Gary. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "g3zjo" >>>>>> To: >>>>>> Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 8:46 PM >>>>>> Subject: LF: CMSFK8 success >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Only one way at the moment, I am RXing G6AVK 100% using CMFSK8 >>>>>>> 12.5Hz BW on 475.500KHz. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tuning has to be spot on for success, having used early PSK31 >>>>>>> myself this is a doddle. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >