Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 234343800009C; Sat, 2 Mar 2013 07:40:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UBlj0-0002Qa-Sb for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:39:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UBlj0-0002QR-9M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:39:38 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UBliy-0001J4-Fo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:39:37 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBACXxMVFcGSDU/2dsb2JhbAANN8JHgRGDEgEBAQEDgQUECwkIBAEBAQkWCAcJAwIBAgE0CQgTBgIBAYd9A68WiUQLiTKNXIE2EQEGgzoDlkaTdIFy X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,767,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217";a="410624599" Received: from host-92-25-32-212.as13285.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([92.25.32.212]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 02 Mar 2013 12:39:15 +0000 Message-ID: <5131F2F3.9000909@psk31.plus.com> Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 12:39:15 +0000 From: g3zjo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <165DFADF844B423F946979B86DCA56C7@AGB> <0CE08C640EDA48DD97E19B143502C364@AGB> <48FA9DB8022543919A9F05049D7C7CFE@AGB> In-Reply-To: <48FA9DB8022543919A9F05049D7C7CFE@AGB> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130301-1, 01/03/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: What about CMSK8, currently testing on 475.210, its not crowded there but may move up later to 478.100. Slightly Critical tuning takes operator skill should suit Mal. Ed [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: b99b9f5ebb2905dfac0746d3f825052c Subject: Re: LF: rtty 478 ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070909010303020101050207" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b965131f352621d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070909010303020101050207 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What about CMSK8, currently testing on 475.210, its not crowded there but may move up later to 478.100. Slightly Critical tuning takes operator skill should suit Mal. Ed On 01/03/2013 21:28, Graham wrote: > Stereo > Multi psk has 85 hz shift amtor - that was not there in the > good old days ? > that should work well ? > G. > > *From:* Gary - G4WGT > *Sent:* Friday, March 01, 2013 9:22 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Subject:* Re: LF: rtty 478 ? > > Hi Graham, LF, > Just testing tonight for some serious RTTY QSO attempts over weekend. > Thanks for your report & Well Done over 2 paths. > 73, > Gary - G4WGT. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Graham > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Sent:* Friday, March 01, 2013 9:06 PM > *Subject:* Re: LF: rtty 478 ? > > Via Tween WEB SDR > AJCSV UYRYRY RYRSRYRY TESTING DE G4WGT G4WGT - T83QO -KENWOOD > TS-440S "RACAL LINEAR AMPLIFIER - UPM CAL ANLENET- 100OW ERP 8 > RTTYREPLIEE AND E-MAIL REPORTS ARE WELCOME DE G4WGT K AK > > *From:* Graham > *Sent:* Friday, March 01, 2013 8:58 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Subject:* Re: LF: rtty 478 ? > > 478.2 mid tones 75 shift 45.45 baud > &)--"GQU"?96 TESTING DE G4WGT G4WGT - IO83QO -KENWOOD TS-440S " > RACAL LINEAR AMPLIFIER - 12M VERTICAL ANTENNA - 100MW ERP - RTTY > REPLIES AND E-MAIL REPORTS ARE WELCOME DE G4WGT K > > *From:* Graham > *Sent:* Friday, March 01, 2013 8:50 PM > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > *Subject:* LF: rtty 478 ? > > rtty on 478 -- who ? > G. > --------------070909010303020101050207 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What about CMSK8, currently testing on 475.210, its not crowded there but may move up later to 478.100.

Slightly Critical tuning takes operator skill should suit Mal.

Ed

On 01/03/2013 21:28, Graham wrote:
Stereo
 
Multi psk  has  85  hz  shift  amtor  - that  was not  there  in the  good  old  days  ?
 
that  should   work  well ?
 
G.
 

Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: LF: rtty 478 ?

Hi Graham, LF,
 
Just testing tonight for some serious RTTY QSO attempts over weekend.
 
Thanks for your report & Well Done over 2 paths.
 
73,
 
Gary - G4WGT.
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Graham
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: LF: rtty 478 ?

Via Tween WEB SDR
 
AJCSV UYRYRY RYRSRYRY TESTING DE G4WGT G4WGT -  T83QO -KENWOOD TS-440S "RACAL LINEAR AMPLIFIER - UPM CAL ANLENET- 100OW ERP 8 RTTYREPLIEE AND E-MAIL REPORTS ARE WELCOME DE G4WGT    K AK
 
 

From: Graham
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 8:58 PM
Subject: Re: LF: rtty 478 ?

478.2  mid  tones    75 shift   45.45  baud
 
 
&)--"GQU"?96 TESTING DE G4WGT G4WGT - IO83QO -KENWOOD TS-440S " RACAL LINEAR AMPLIFIER - 12M VERTICAL ANTENNA - 100MW ERP - RTTY REPLIES AND E-MAIL REPORTS ARE WELCOME DE G4WGT    K

From: Graham
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 8:50 PM
Subject: LF: rtty 478 ?

rtty  on 478 --  who ?
 
 
 
G.

--------------070909010303020101050207--