Message-ID: <5131CE67.2040001@psk31.plus.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 10:03:19 +0000
From: g3zjo <g3zjo@psk31.plus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <511E9DBE.7050108@mbsks.franken.de> <1362086570.254404.31316.19832@saddam3.rambler.ru> <51307C4D.4020506@mbsks.franken.de> <5130A910.80303@freenet.de> <F4C9DB6E936446C2921B7675BF6C5E63@AGB>
In-Reply-To: <F4C9DB6E936446C2921B7675BF6C5E63@AGB>
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR-15 on 630m
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------010206050004020407030509"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010206050004020407030509
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 01/03/2013 14:54, Graham wrote:
> An interesting  thing
> With  so many  wspr   stations  running ,  why in the  last week  are 
> there  only  2  stations  showing as  decoded in  the  USA , and non 
> other than  we2xgr  (who has a valid reason)  , Im sure  in the  past 
> , there  was a much  higher   number  of  TA decodes  with  less  stations
Lack of big boys.?
> Q Is it  true , there  is a  carrier-in-pass  band  de-sensing problem 
> with the  wspr  decode  ?
Not as I have noticed, if you look at my grabber, there is QRSS using 
WSPR tones pretty strong adjacent to M1GEO (and others when they are on) 
makes no difference at all. This can also be a carrier. Of course a huge 
signal can de-sense the RX.

Ed
> The  large  ground wave  radius on MF has caused  problems  with  
> other modes  in the  past
> G..
>


--------------010206050004020407030509
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    On 01/03/2013 14:54, Graham wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:F4C9DB6E936446C2921B7675BF6C5E63@AGB"
      type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <meta name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19400">
      <div>An interesting  thing </div>
      <div> </div>
      <div>With  so many  wspr   stations  running ,  why in the  last
        week  are there  only  2  stations  showing as  decoded in  the 
        USA , and non other than  we2xgr  (who has a valid reason)  , Im
        sure  in the  past , there  was a much  higher   number  of  TA
        decodes  with  less  stations<br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    Lack of big boys.?<br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:F4C9DB6E936446C2921B7675BF6C5E63@AGB"
      type="cite">
      <div> </div>
      <div>Q Is it  true , there  is a  carrier-in-pass  band 
        de-sensing problem with the  wspr  decode  ?<br>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    Not as I have noticed, if you look at my grabber, there is QRSS
    using WSPR tones pretty strong adjacent to M1GEO (and others when
    they are on) makes no difference at all. This can also be a carrier.
    Of course a huge signal can de-sense the RX.<br>
    <br>
    Ed<br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:F4C9DB6E936446C2921B7675BF6C5E63@AGB"
      type="cite">
      <div> </div>
      <div>The  large  ground wave  radius on MF has caused  problems 
        with  other modes  in the  past </div>
      <div> </div>
      <div>G..</div>
      <div> </div>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------010206050004020407030509--