Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 03452380000A8; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 17:24:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UBYMJ-0000kB-Lg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:23:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UBYMJ-0000k2-9V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:23:19 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UBYMH-0007od-Oh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 22:23:18 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r21MNHCH018211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 23:23:17 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id r21MNGmH024249 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 23:23:16 +0100 Message-ID: <51312A4F.8030701@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 23:23:11 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <51311083.4070507@broadpark.no> <51312943.7020400@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <51312943.7020400@broadpark.no> X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Steinar, I tried to decode you but no success. But the weekend just started! :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC [...] Content analysis details: (-3.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [129.206.210.211 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7001055fa59a9c23b9831ea6d317a074 Subject: Re: LF: Wolf on 600m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d7b9a51312a8b2457 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Steinar, I tried to decode you but no success. But the weekend just started! :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 01.03.2013 23:18, schrieb Steinar Aanesland: > qrt, > > LA5VNA Steinar > loc:JO59jq > > > Den 01.03.2013 21:33, skrev Steinar Aanesland: > >> Hi all >> >> I will be trying wolf on 600m tonight. I am not sure my transverter is >> stable enough, but you never know if you don't try. >> >> I will be using default parameters and normal speed 10 bit/sec. >> I will try to be as close to 475.550 KHz as I can. >> >> I will start TXing 2045 UTC >> >> Report is much appreciated >> >> >> >