Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4440D3800018C; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 17:25:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UDLW9-00062b-87 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:04:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UDLW8-00062S-SA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:04:52 +0000 Received: from smtpout4.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.68] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UDLW3-0000fh-Ao for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 21:04:51 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.14.174]) by mwinf5d48 with ME id 8M4S1l00R3lKFV603M4SWZ; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 22:04:26 +0100 Message-ID: <466E02F602104403B2435743DB94E7B0@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <51378EC1.5030309@psk31.plus.com> <5137970B.6060600@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51379FA1.1040308@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <9F2D8D74F7F0410FADCEFDF26F664846@AGB> <2295BF6FEF9C47109A86F3F7081209A2@SV8CSHP> <5137ABAE.1030505@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <5137ABAE.1030505@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 21:04:26 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Yes , first mistake was picking 50 baud as most ham-progs are looking for 45.45 there is some wide 180 shift LF of Stefan , not printed anything yet lost in the ' In the shuffling madness' as JT would say [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.68 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503 Subject: Re: LF: 478.200 RTTY Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1495137c2637ce2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Yes , first mistake was picking 50 baud as most ham-progs are looking for 45.45 there is some wide 180 shift LF of Stefan , not printed anything yet lost in the ' In the shuffling madness' as JT would say G. -------------------------------------------------- From: "g3zjo" Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 8:48 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: 478.200 RTTY > Hi Spiros > > There seem to be several stations and several un announced modes now on > air. > > I am hopefully in the clear above Stefan testing MFSK4 now. > > MFSK4 is on Fldigi Software, needs accurate tuning but not as critical as > CMFSK8. > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO > > On 06/03/2013 20:26, SV8CS- Spiros Chimarios wrote: >> Just received only this: >> R RSGB LF REFLRCTOR CGAT) BLAKSHEEP.86,' >> >> Who is TXing RTTY now? >> Spiros/SV8CS >> >> >> >> > >