Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 789043800008E; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 18:10:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1UE6Cs-00048E-Cs for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:56:06 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1UE6Cr-000485-Si for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:56:05 +0000 Received: from smtpout2.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.42] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1UE6Cq-00030U-27 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:56:04 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.27.189.59]) by mwinf5d20 with ME id 9Avj1l00D1HL2VN03Avj0K; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 23:55:43 +0100 Message-ID: <1B980A44055C4709A0D1C90850CAE82B@AGB> From: "Graham" To: References: <513A59B1.4010704@psk31.plus.com> <3B98DD89AAE54F03A77870996396B316@AGB> <513A68BE.3000706@psk31.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <513A68BE.3000706@psk31.plus.com> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 22:55:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Could be ? I have not used those modes for a long time .. didn't like the American square dance , with everything timed and pre-formatted ..had some fun with the reverse reporting system on hf ... but that got tedious [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 4c0633a540d76adc241b9d3cede72a57 Subject: Re: LF: Oh Dear Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40c9513a6fcc3bed X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Could be ? I have not used those modes for a long time .. didn't like the American square dance , with everything timed and pre-formatted ..had some fun with the reverse reporting system on hf ... but that got tedious psk-D thats a no-no , it will work , but the IMD will be very high ,with big loss of s/n and you will tx a very wide signal ......psk produces a two-tone-test envelope long interleave mfsk is the best suited mode for MF / mf tx set ups , problem is the long interleave tends to pull the qso out , but without it , the decode is sporadic G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "g3zjo" Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 10:39 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Oh Dear > Hi G > > Just wondering if its possibly an error message, I can't remember where I > have seen it before certainly not MF. > > Ironic, its the first unsolicited recognition of my signal on 600 / 630m, > other than WSPR and Opera modes, which I always say the reporter has no > choice. > > Seems the ideal mode for QRP 2 Way. Personally I would park it just above > WSPR15. > > What do you say about PK31 with a Class D PA? > > Ed > > On 08/03/2013 22:10, Graham wrote: >> Thats handy Ed , Its raining up here , was wondering where the >> moon was : ) >> >> what is not the wrong mode then ? >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "g3zjo" >> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 9:35 PM >> To: >> Subject: LF: Oh Dear >> >>> We are starting this are we.? The frequency has been clear for days so >>> you do a test QRP test and you get this. Who says? >>> >>> Was the QRSS Morse that was ignored this afternoon the wrong mode? >>> >>> G3ZJO >>> >> >> > >