Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BFFAC380000E6; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:23:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U4tqr-00020w-R6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:55:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U4tqr-00020n-FC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:55:21 +0000 Received: from smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.39]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U4tql-0002Ym-RN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:55:20 +0000 Received: from pc-roelof (ndb.demon.nl [82.161.81.65]) by smtp-vbr19.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1BDsnfD030450 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:54:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roelof@ndb.demon.nl) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <5118F273.2040106@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:54:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Roelof Bakker" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5118F273.2040106@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.14 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Stefan, > -Is 150 Hz BW useful for CW beacons? Imagine there are 3 CW beacons in > 150 Hz to the same time. How does it sound when you have a 500 Hz CW > filter? Maybe this is mend to be an entry class level for NDB hunters, where it is not unusual to find more than 5 stations within 20 Hz. Or it is to encourage the use of really narrow CW filters! [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.109.24.39 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 59677119386dcf9f1872cb454dc1331d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: Re: LF: 472kHz Bandplan or whatever Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601a5118fee8429a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Stefan, > -Is 150 Hz BW useful for CW beacons? Imagine there are 3 CW beacons in > 150 Hz to the same time. How does it sound when you have a 500 Hz CW > filter? Maybe this is mend to be an entry class level for NDB hunters, where it is not unusual to find more than 5 stations within 20 Hz. Or it is to encourage the use of really narrow CW filters! This whole thread is an excellent demonstration of two classes of human nature: those who can't live without regulation of all details of live (even if they don't actually participate) and those who can! 73, Roelof, pa0rdt