Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4B2B43800008E; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 18:11:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U2rFT-0002yo-8h for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:44:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U2rFS-0002yf-Sa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:44:18 +0000 Received: from smtpout5.wanadoo.co.uk ([80.12.242.80] helo=smtpout.wanadoo.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U2rFR-0001Gp-9Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:44:17 +0000 Received: from AGB ([2.26.8.73]) by mwinf5d66 with ME id wmjv1k00G1aYY8a03mjwLD; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 23:43:56 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 22:43:55 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Depends on the band , HF uses the Ae power feed , Looks a bit odd on mf/lf to see 400 watts etc on MF or 1000 + on LF , so there was a decision , some time back to use the Ae ERP or what ever to indicate the Rf level , I don't think its documented . [...] Content analysis details: (0.2 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.12.242.80 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: Re: LF: declared power on WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc1475111919c4805 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Depends on the band , HF uses the Ae power feed , Looks a bit odd on mf/lf to see 400 watts etc on MF or 1000 + on LF , so there was a decision , some time back to use the Ae ERP or what ever to indicate the Rf level , I don't think its documented . 73 -G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Dimitrios Tsifakis" Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 10:22 PM To: Subject: LF: declared power on WSPR > Hi group, > > I was browsing the WSPR database for MF and noticed that I am the only > one declaring a 50 W power. My TX power output is 50 W, however the > radiate power is just a tiny fraction of 1 W. What is the protocol for > WSPR? Advertise the Pout or the EIRP? > > 73, Dimitris VK1SV >