Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mp01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8EA1838000082; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:22:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U8Iz0-0002Xf-0R for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:21:50 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U8Iyz-0002XV-Dj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:21:49 +0000 Received: from nm4-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.229]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Iyx-00048x-0A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:21:48 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.197] by nm4.bt.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Feb 2013 23:21:25 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.174] by tm3.bt.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Feb 2013 23:21:25 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp115.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Feb 2013 23:21:25 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1361402485; bh=JBy09QQgd9l/R7FNQc4ub7sAr7B+6NrwnFH4nc4vGCU=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=BGlLzwjIAP3X7NeD4QEqMyB3XMelcb17la65XkhiZ/3GwDADevzvTjSYxkwuZTLE5m0MKi7MNpX8w6mLzGsw46SwmPlcEpSAgjdeq5TL1c+272aolebji6smBebySHaxOVXQAaCPK0Kl7qLoJZgpImX3UeZxfrPQE/CuhOgpSqc= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 367534.92831.bm@smtp115.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: l0B0ZIkVM1nk0LHgGZpNHltMEiLT.76y7w7A9zaFrtXBpzX Q2aaM6gp6HHC2yeY2Fma49MmdFVcJ7uARoE_nNGBf.xhQyf4POfnYiA6SIgl _JJUSy6Bqi1UYPvQ05uhZRXJSSifh67hoQeW92HC.4GukbTdGXxxv6fQttQQ Q_cTZQViacWxQ5wu0uf.YWMvoHc5qcifLlxvWkZq.H4RSQxXgLY5A18B4hpH xritXXPP44sSbDOMd5QWqsvhMtLb1.glzd55by1EZVeuSRlYl0LaC7Tya86o VR61pXGEGBgCcViG2AmkbxI_GtqHCCKZVxWglv9EE5VyQEHIEMwrCcea4xEF 4CF5nhXr2tlRCv5isX9sisaUsoEWUd2GqmISq3rCG11k_EtklccUJsUr.cc9 t2_6sPRu1GUeynJR5bkB_0aIFggCp1JlqOmyaDfUbPpxMLdGIc_1mC4Lcp8h jJ6LxVVuVArknKBR9nFO7DsNTRtZ3MrUCe5vUOtQi54rTH27GFJiUKi1RvKW hf4aCZJvVbWKQ8.uyZDlbRomec91JYA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from gnat (alan.melia@109.148.134.241 with login) by smtp115.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2013 23:21:25 +0000 UTC Message-ID: From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <51241A3B.5020105@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51241C8C.4030001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001301ce0f67$423300d0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <6CCB8568E37648CFB765B787E462B4DA@gnat> <003801ce0f7b$1c63f530$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <512547BF.8070900@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:10:30 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130220-1, 20/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan it is difficult to draw any firm conclusions from sporadic "catches" but shall we say that there is nothing that seems to disprove it. :-)) I am processing data on the path from CFH Halifax in 2003, before I "saw the light". This shows a distinct "edge".......so that when the Dst is low (say <-60nT ) there are no periods of good strength reception. The higher the Dst the more likely there will be a good night and the lonnger the good period will be. However picking a night with a higher level of Dst does not ensure good reception but does make it more probable. I am now looking at details of selected nights to see if I can determine a relationship to the better conditions. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [217.146.182.229 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: b707651713bcd4ad9db4bb0f5d794041 Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-mp01.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1dc14551255ac56597 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Stefan it is difficult to draw any firm conclusions from sporadic "catches" but shall we say that there is nothing that seems to disprove it. :-)) I am processing data on the path from CFH Halifax in 2003, before I "saw the light". This shows a distinct "edge".......so that when the Dst is low (say <-60nT ) there are no periods of good strength reception. The higher the Dst the more likely there will be a good night and the lonnger the good period will be. However picking a night with a higher level of Dst does not ensure good reception but does make it more probable. I am now looking at details of selected nights to see if I can determine a relationship to the better conditions. I feel a bit like a weather forecaster predicting "sunny periods with showers, some gusty winds, a little snow in places, accompanied by the odd thunderstorm" :-)) i.e. "I don't know, but there will be "weather"......." Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 10:01 PM Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west > Jay, Alan, Mark, LF, > > Thanks for the discussion and for watching. KU7Z, that sounds like a > challenge! Not sure if i can make that path in this time of the year. But > we never know... > > Alan, did you get more informations which confirm or deny your theory > since the Venezuela grabber is available? > > 73, Stefan > > > Am 20.02.2013 16:44, schrieb Alan Melia: >> Thanks for that Jay I will factor that into my musings :-)) >> I think that is within the range I have been considering.....so that is >> very useful data. >> You put the finger on the difficulty of knowing how much the local noise >> level has shifted, but this is where your long experience is an >> advantage. >> >> I have a vast amount of data the problem is thinking of a way of >> displaying it that will stimulate some new ideas.....plenty to fill my >> waking hours :-)) >> >> Alan >> G3NYK >> ----- Original Message ----- From: >> To: >> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:01 PM >> Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west >> >> >>> Alan >>> >>> Thanks for your comments. >>> >>> Based on Spectrum Lab's s/n measurement, along with that of WSPR, I >>> would say that we are in a period where signals are down roughly 6 - 10 >>> dB on the EU > NA T/A path as compared to a month ago. There have been a >>> few nights where the noise floor was elevated due to thunderstorms in >>> the US but I am not including them in my observation. >>> >>> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 >>> >>> p.s. I rarely use Argo any more since it is virtually impossible to >>> determine s/n of the received signals. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" >>> >>> To: >>> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:32 AM >>> Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west >>> >>> >>>> Hi Jay I am still pondering this, plotting Dst against "period receive >>>> signal exceeds xdB" gives a interesting but not very illumination >>>> picture. It provides a cut off when theDstis depressed, but it shows a >>>> wide range of received signals when the Dst is high (towards zero nT). >>>> I am still looking for another factor. >>>> >>>> By "quiet period" I mean Kp <2 for 10 days or more.... really quiet >>>> geomagnetically and signal levels seem to be unexpectedly poor. Then >>>> signals seem to improve after a low level event say Kp=4 . That led to >>>> my idea of ionospheric "leak". >>>> >>>> However taking a quick look at the recent conditions, things look >>>> active enough to be "normal". It is very confusing but I am looking to >>>> see if it could be explained by just an unfavourable path >>>> length/fading. Unfortunately one needs several stations in different >>>> location to either tranmit, or several receiving stations to receive >>>> the same signal to see the effect of this. If some paths are >>>> unfavouable other should be favoured. >>>> >>>> One problem also is I do not know what a "subjectively" worse signal >>>> means, does it mean 10dB ?? Most likely not waterfal displays are very >>>> non-linear so it might only be a dB or two. That could easily be >>>> expained by a fading pattern involving say three different hop modes. >>>> >>>> There was a grab recently that shoed Stefan and Markus. Markus was >>>> fading to a "ragged" trace at times whereas Stefan was solid all the >>>> time, though they were probably seeing similar fading conditions. >>>> >>>> I am still not convinced that there is not some other effect but I cant >>>> find anything:-)) Bit like "Dark Propagation" :-)) >>>> >>>> Best Wishes >>>> Alan >>>> G3NYK >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: >>>> To: >>>> Cc: ; >>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:38 PM >>>> Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west >>>> >>>> >>>>> Stefan >>>>> >>>>> Good copy last night ... although some dB short of the 'best' >>>>> conditions. Seem to recall Alan mentioning that prolonged 'quiet' >>>>> periods can be less favorable than those that feature some 'ups and >>>>> downs'. Maybe Alan will chime in. >>>>> >>>>> Representative capture below. Copy past 0800Z at >>>>> http://www.w1vd.com/interestinggrab.html ... if you squint hard >>>>> enough. >>>>> >>>>> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >