Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 601DF380000AE; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:48:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U8FdS-0000mN-Ly for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:47:22 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U8FdS-0000mE-4q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:47:22 +0000 Received: from nm2-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.108.92]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U8FdP-0003Nn-SG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 19:47:21 +0000 Received: from [212.82.108.229] by nm2.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Feb 2013 19:46:58 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.163] by tm2.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Feb 2013 19:46:58 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp104.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Feb 2013 19:46:58 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1361389618; bh=SdcYqATlFX7/BXOPQDntQ0BmMDb4hTJZo3AVorlI4Dg=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=u3cV3cf6GfCSOsqVQRupxBU5mDzEhmXYQ7ktpqM+X57JXMuLA2oRwfxZmNqmyYRn10p15/mzv3jx/w1qWsBqf0MpAZWYAGyVJph2+cidlcxj0nL4nfVz5t1yyShodalk/Cy0+MqmZKsae0ssWhSfVwk9H2RiOLstXzXfF+NUoQ4= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 69027.52289.bm@smtp104.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: WlQZousVM1n51Nq3M2U2TZ8ZaiXzcUDw2GTGnCCSr16r0kW F3A45HOH91Qn9muUDSUEALZpkGDbOsSPiuYCW6zrSKmFfKJw0hRsfDY4sjFL 9EuKuvXTivPgS1zvMWGza1hhwN5f2YP1FB0vougJqY9lGo9kM89rfXcMkuny zP86MbXAA7JfH2XxoYDU2JBY2AgPeVORZrO6SaWaN5wI21w11mxtHmiKttHk GbtVfjt9KtYiYGuPs4gea0kg1w9yW.j0IJSOD1r85vxP7BJzqN5rad5E1Y6X 7IgJIuQUE7K16SiViXZTIgeMngrDMTvw3o1fq0s8LOHVdaHIs28lnMRNAk35 .TC.EInbFkZ5na9OlD3m7SIioqZcUXydCB3qT.ieOOhb1otxAhakGbPP7bjy iKB_vrxo1Km6IiYRnWCKXgJe8Vuj00CbNAG56Li0GaMO1jaKMPb8FajCNDE3 TsOjBW6gxJ3PcWrW0psdp5gZEAApWSFSM5nlbAxDXnOOihlCV2hVKTNXC182 p2.D_PPfFmcRzYxghqoM8ynFXG3ykWA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from gnat (alan.melia@109.148.134.241 with login) by smtp104.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2013 19:46:57 +0000 UTC Message-ID: From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <51241A3B.5020105@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51241C8C.4030001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001301ce0f67$423300d0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <6CCB8568E37648CFB765B787E462B4DA@gnat> <003801ce0f7b$1c63f530$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:44:03 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130220-0, 20/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks for that Jay I will factor that into my musings :-)) I think that is within the range I have been considering.....so that is very useful data. You put the finger on the difficulty of knowing how much the local noise level has shifted, but this is where your long experience is an advantage. [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.108.92 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: f64a6c8ea7591cecbecc6db95ffdd328 Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ca5125289a6bac X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Thanks for that Jay I will factor that into my musings :-)) I think that is within the range I have been considering.....so that is very useful data. You put the finger on the difficulty of knowing how much the local noise level has shifted, but this is where your long experience is an advantage. I have a vast amount of data the problem is thinking of a way of displaying it that will stimulate some new ideas.....plenty to fill my waking hours :-)) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:01 PM Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west > Alan > > Thanks for your comments. > > Based on Spectrum Lab's s/n measurement, along with that of WSPR, I would > say that we are in a period where signals are down roughly 6 - 10 dB on > the EU > NA T/A path as compared to a month ago. There have been a few > nights where the noise floor was elevated due to thunderstorms in the US > but I am not including them in my observation. > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 > > p.s. I rarely use Argo any more since it is virtually impossible to > determine s/n of the received signals. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alan Melia" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 9:32 AM > Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west > > >> Hi Jay I am still pondering this, plotting Dst against "period receive >> signal exceeds xdB" gives a interesting but not very illumination >> picture. It provides a cut off when theDstis depressed, but it shows a >> wide range of received signals when the Dst is high (towards zero nT). I >> am still looking for another factor. >> >> By "quiet period" I mean Kp <2 for 10 days or more.... really quiet >> geomagnetically and signal levels seem to be unexpectedly poor. Then >> signals seem to improve after a low level event say Kp=4 . That led to my >> idea of ionospheric "leak". >> >> However taking a quick look at the recent conditions, things look active >> enough to be "normal". It is very confusing but I am looking to see if it >> could be explained by just an unfavourable path length/fading. >> Unfortunately one needs several stations in different location to either >> tranmit, or several receiving stations to receive the same signal to see >> the effect of this. If some paths are unfavouable other should be >> favoured. >> >> One problem also is I do not know what a "subjectively" worse signal >> means, does it mean 10dB ?? Most likely not waterfal displays are very >> non-linear so it might only be a dB or two. That could easily be expained >> by a fading pattern involving say three different hop modes. >> >> There was a grab recently that shoed Stefan and Markus. Markus was fading >> to a "ragged" trace at times whereas Stefan was solid all the time, >> though they were probably seeing similar fading conditions. >> >> I am still not convinced that there is not some other effect but I cant >> find anything:-)) Bit like "Dark Propagation" :-)) >> >> Best Wishes >> Alan >> G3NYK >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: >> To: >> Cc: ; >> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:38 PM >> Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west >> >> >>> Stefan >>> >>> Good copy last night ... although some dB short of the 'best' >>> conditions. Seem to recall Alan mentioning that prolonged 'quiet' >>> periods can be less favorable than those that feature some 'ups and >>> downs'. Maybe Alan will chime in. >>> >>> Representative capture below. Copy past 0800Z at >>> http://www.w1vd.com/interestinggrab.html ... if you squint hard enough. >>> >>> Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 >>> >> >> > >