Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A69BC380000B1; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 17:24:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U2qul-0002r8-7k for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:22:55 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U2quk-0002qz-RL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:22:54 +0000 Received: from mail-ia0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U2qui-0001CM-Gi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:22:53 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f174.google.com with SMTP id o25so742136iad.19 for ; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:22:30 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=GuyVH+TTgkn0st3byiUF+a6ZcKC5GpX8+rXz02dFexc=; b=Tfux4ObYL988fbYJERrJn7chSH3Y/qZj9+yGu/KoqIkk0UlYXns5xR+nMW6Ehp/Nie IWpovHyr9MzErBat634K4VyskjRbegqX/kIFneAky795gncZEhGhe0iZNmA9/0JK1FQT Qn5T+8nlY/+CzVx02LHfQXUx7465uOqueANPqw4gb/RvRGgOPgHYcQYOc9AhoRFN8rQ/ X8vHahjnA57J68d4qBz4ir/FbeBLRXb8rpHrELH+Tf576RLLOJWDn8/TNm+ZSpG1snbY LucOsh4m4ayqHr4N5X2DK5fEnRmrbAa39i/R92DsLtP+lt+SJLBr7EfjRRH7Gc33BU+F FI7A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.196.138 with SMTP id im10mr1261853igc.83.1360102950033; Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:22:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.28.47 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:22:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:22:29 +1100 Message-ID: From: Dimitrios Tsifakis To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi group, I was browsing the WSPR database for MF and noticed that I am the only one declaring a 50 W power. My TX power output is 50 W, however the radiate power is just a tiny fraction of 1 W. What is the protocol for WSPR? Advertise the Pout or the EIRP? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.210.174 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dtsifakis[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: ddae800c6581715278ab3184b42d46db Subject: LF: declared power on WSPR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-di03.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da6075111868a71ff X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi group, I was browsing the WSPR database for MF and noticed that I am the only one declaring a 50 W power. My TX power output is 50 W, however the radiate power is just a tiny fraction of 1 W. What is the protocol for WSPR? Advertise the Pout or the EIRP? 73, Dimitris VK1SV