Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9446D380000B2; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:52:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U20ty-0000J8-Of for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 14:50:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U20ty-0000Iz-8D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 14:50:38 +0000 Received: from mail-qe0-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U20tu-0000Hb-69 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 14:50:37 +0000 Received: by mail-qe0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 1so2535503qeb.27 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 06:50:12 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LJBJwIXxdEiHknfNuWatzjQVT+z8ZJqlUVXBO3fp9HQ=; b=KiD/yVcmWz1IvevlWNphwP6ckF5nGJEh3Y5TBkXjjOxVvmOAzzCjcnd8IgPdLFxZHi AQbYi1yMhd6W27uplGBWyQsjaezo4j1Xp8P2XQTtJzdG48Pmga/3e6RHBQA/s7250Knc XhZGruHU77KXOIS3rKaJ1R2cNyKLrXS0iFnLQC1DEgkXemFk02pLVK/GTRCsEUlXpkAJ Jc+6cmYTAJ3Pd8MfM54dLaJuKYSUMipHdr7QjmkJa8v6POpj1BwreEp7cETMAxMwuN9Z /WvBeA7uMvl9xBXlXlfqlmnmJI8FFX7uvx5iN+4nahDdCO/DkSr0IpCx2kvJduQR5lBQ McEg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.48.43 with SMTP id i11mr20353855qen.3.1359903011933; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 06:50:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.201.228 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 06:50:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:50:11 +0000 Message-ID: From: Roger Lapthorn To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Using a very stable external signal generator as my 10MHz LO 5dBm injection for my transverter, I'm now in a position to try WSPR15 TX with a stable signal. After a quick frequency check with WSPR2 this afternoon (reports please), I propose to switch to WSPR15 with its greatly improved weak signal capability for this evening and possibly overnight. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.128.54 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: LF: WSPR15 on 136kHz USB dial Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d89c2f48fca04d4d31791 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-di02.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da606510e79c41d6c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --047d7b6d89c2f48fca04d4d31791 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Using a very stable external signal generator as my 10MHz LO 5dBm injection for my transverter, I'm now in a position to try WSPR15 TX with a stable signal. After a quick frequency check with WSPR2 this afternoon (reports please), I propose to switch to WSPR15 with its greatly improved weak signal capability for this evening and possibly overnight. *Please* let me have any reports both of the WSPR2 transmission and the later WSPR15 ones. 73s Roger G3XBM -- http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ http://www.g3xbm.co.uk https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ http://qss2.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/G3XBM --047d7b6d89c2f48fca04d4d31791 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Using a very stable external signal generator as= my 10MHz LO 5dBm=20 injection for my transverter, I'm now in a position to try WSPR15 TX wi= th a stable signal.=20 After a quick frequency check with WSPR2 this afternoon (reports please), I= propose to switch to WSPR15=20 with its greatly improved weak signal capability for this evening and=20 possibly overnight.

Please let me have any reports both of the WSPR2 transmission= and the later WSPR15 ones.

73s
Roger G3XBM
--047d7b6d89c2f48fca04d4d31791--