Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 70B67380000F8; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:07:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U8KA5-0003kk-Jp for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:37:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U8KA4-0003kS-JW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:37:20 +0000 Received: from nm2-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U8KA2-000540-Do for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:37:19 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.195] by nm2.bt.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Feb 2013 00:36:57 -0000 Received: from [217.146.189.77] by tm1.bt.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Feb 2013 00:36:57 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp827.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 21 Feb 2013 00:36:56 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1361407016; bh=zynh7mGwvwH+nZXWJ6HwsluxRWgc6dy0smoht/3NNvQ=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=hJQ6EmGkXH4ie9elu8lhSOLp0zTDkxAxR8Fjzk0kxZluDfcbqIDCVmEI8MwW/goTawWMuNmKvdqOEQ/47/FkyxnkG+m4Gmkj/4HfG4tzjDrEtHHxiS8rX+ulRM1Pf4RXVsfhAkhU21ycitbnyx+cMYPk082donY0MwX/kOIkhqc= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 976368.12932.bm@smtp827.mail.ird.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: dhb4UpsVM1lbOwBPoUagTo7A1Yx_2.pV7F9JuCNFlQ1zgML AMfcOXj3OovMZGb3VuXUbFQflEQ55wFBGytJwA19Ri3NM3Q.bunDKHwk9lCd BhwJkaVupq.FtFMr8.U1Jb0uhxbOymFjN7naFliZdxRpSh9pqMsIuWLtvakQ g_TvV_wpiw8A73EkuLL4lEm5cy3qvpeWw0EfD.FdtE_UwOPVjnoHEo.m3bPM e4HcV2Ngo0qEFKXE9Da8G5VlwzwmrEDsP6CcrKh17g2TWJwyEp.WLPhxz1Yf 1PvQzxH6Ovm9zG4JmTwzVZTlmLmkcIbnQk9XBvd18M2LExb8kq.mzC00fNI7 HCU9V4RCNeckdCrEpJbcHjKJbM9bZvCGuFbxSgYpHdkk3XmquX4I_5cI2WET iQL8ICiEr5Lw4wkFAUQpVgq73JDnlnJh6pS9XvmxQge65Rjgl9BCGwEkfF24 OOrNpFsWyr4Kt0kf2bFPRNUg- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from gnat (alan.melia@109.148.134.241 with login) by smtp827.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2013 16:36:56 -0800 PST Message-ID: <806B90B7E76A4D51BA2107695914CE91@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <0D6A002F5866403CAAD6118B8354E58B@Black> <51255D2D.7040709@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51255E03.2020400@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1085BA2CB666460FB4B229CCC0C47A64@Black> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:36:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130220-1, 20/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Ah if it was mine I was in the middle of typing some messages when I got a phone call, tthis afternoon and they didnt get sent till later. So my message time may be delayed.....check the header too. Habit from the dial-up days I send them in batches. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [217.146.182.242 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: 4998b3eda037fec4e885bebc9a2db934 Subject: Re: LF: Slow Blacksheep? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016_01CE0FCB.8E392310" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,HTML_40_50, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-ma04.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600c51257364097a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CE0FCB.8E392310 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ah if it was mine I was in the middle of typing some messages when I got = a phone call, tthis afternoon and they didnt get sent till later. So my = message time may be delayed.....check the header too. Habit from the = dial-up days I send them in batches. Or else my time machine needs oiling :-)) Alan ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Markus Vester=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:53 PM Subject: Re: LF: Slow Blacksheep? Yep Stefan, your's got here within a minute as well. This afternoon however, Alan's "Re LF Beacon to the west" was staped = as originating at 16:44 CET, but arrived here at 20:48. Wonder if it's the "downlink", transporting "bulk" content through = AOL? Best 73,=20 Markus ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:36 AM Subject: Re: LF: Slow Blacksheep? received 23:36 UTC, =3D 3 minutes =3D not slow :-) 73, Stefan Am 21.02.2013 00:33, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:=20 test: Sent at 23:33 UTC Am 20.02.2013 23:36, schrieb Markus Vester:=20 After a prolonged quiet phase, Blacksheep LF reflector messages = are pouring in again, but some of the timestamps show that there have = been delays up to several hours. Anyone else experiencing similar = problems? Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CE0FCB.8E392310 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Ah if it was mine I was in the middle = of typing=20 some messages when I got a phone call, tthis afternoon and they = didnt get=20 sent till later. So my message time may be delayed.....check the header = too.=20 Habit from the dial-up days I send them in batches.
 
Or else my time machine needs oiling=20 :-))
 
Alan
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Markus=20 Vester
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, = 2013 11:53=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Slow = Blacksheep?

Yep Stefan, your's got here within a = minute as=20 well.
 
This afternoon however, Alan's "Re LF = Beacon to=20 the west" was staped as originating at 16:44 CET, but arrived here at=20 20:48.
 
Wonder if it's the "downlink", = transporting=20 "bulk" content through AOL?
 
Best 73,
Markus
 
 
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: LF: Slow Blacksheep?

received 23:36 UTC, =3D 3 minutes =3D not slow = :-)

73,=20 Stefan

Am 21.02.2013 00:33, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:=20
test: Sent at 23:33 UTC

Am 20.02.2013 23:36, = schrieb=20 Markus Vester:=20
After a prolonged quiet phase, = Blacksheep LF=20 reflector messages are pouring in again, but some of the = timestamps=20 show that there have been delays up to several hours. Anyone = else=20 experiencing similar problems?
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
=
 
------=_NextPart_000_0016_01CE0FCB.8E392310--