Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EF7D738000084; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 05:57:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U1al6-0002kb-5X for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 10:55:44 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U1al5-0002kS-Lf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 10:55:43 +0000 Received: from cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.13]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U1al3-0003ND-4s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 10:55:42 +0000 Received: from cpsps-ews29.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.195]) by cpsmtpb-ews08.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:54:06 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.5]) by cpsps-ews29.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:54:06 +0100 Received: from Extensa ([195.241.183.120]) by CPSMTPM-TLF102.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:55:20 +0100 Message-ID: <7F4CF64248DB4E6184E59688EA3B5435@Extensa> From: "PA1SDB, Peter" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 10:55:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18645 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2013 10:55:20.0579 (UTC) FILETIME=[CB483530:01CE0133] X-RcptDomain: blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: O.K. thanks for info Uwe. You don't have to say sorry :-) It learns us again that a stable signal is very- very- veryyyyy importand. My 424 uHz grabber shows your signal and drift clear with connected pixels My 47 uHz grabber shows no connected line/trace anymore. [...] Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [213.75.39.13 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B11B5 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_B11B5 X-Scan-Signature: 617a5faed955112e448650f4d003a84d Subject: Re: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0CAB_01CE0133.CB05ADF0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da608510cf11f463d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0CAB_01CE0133.CB05ADF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit O.K. thanks for info Uwe. You don't have to say sorry :-) It learns us again that a stable signal is very- very- veryyyyy importand. My 424 uHz grabber shows your signal and drift clear with connected pixels My 47 uHz grabber shows no connected line/trace anymore. Nice to see that the Frequency Error callibration works so well in Spectum Lab. It seems that the Soundcard here is also rock stable with help of that SR cal function. 73s Peter PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb ----- Original Message ----- From: uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 10:10 AM Subject: Re: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz No, Peter, my control capture shows the same. Sri for that. Seems the GPS ant got wet. I have to find out. GL Uwe/dj8wx ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 02.02.2013 09:52 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hello Uwe, I'm not sure, but it looks like your generator is not rock stable anymore since 19h45 UTC yesterday (1 Feb 13) It did drift down about 0.003 Hz. (Ha ha.... 0.003 Hz) Also possible that the trouble is here ofcourse... Now (09h48) drifting back up to 8970.022 Hz Best 73's Peter PA1SDB www.qsl.net/pa1sdb ------=_NextPart_000_0CAB_01CE0133.CB05ADF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
O.K. thanks for info Uwe.
You don't have to say sorry :-)
It learns us again that a stable signal is = very- very-=20 veryyyyy importand.
My 424 uHz grabber shows your signal and=20 drift clear with connected pixels
My   47 uHz grabber shows no = connected=20 line/trace anymore.
 
Nice to see that the Frequency Error = callibration=20 works so well in Spectum Lab.
It seems that the Soundcard here is also rock = stable=20 with help of that SR cal function.
 
73s Peter PA1SDB
 
www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de =
Sent: Saturday, February 02, = 2013 10:10=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: 0.003 Hz drift = DJ8WX at=20 8970,022 Hz

No, Peter, my control capture shows the=20 same.

Sri for that.

Seems the GPS ant got=20 wet.

I have to find=20 out.

GL Uwe/dj8wx


Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet:=20 02.02.2013 09:52
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Betreff:=20 LF: 0.003 Hz drift DJ8WX at 8970,022 Hz

Hello Uwe,
I'm not sure, but it looks = like your=20 generator is not rock stable anymore since 19h45 UTC yesterday (1 Feb=20 13)
It did drift down about = 0.003=20 Hz.  (Ha ha.... 0.003 Hz)
Also possible that the = trouble is here=20 ofcourse...
Now (09h48) drifting back = up to=20 8970.022 Hz
 
Best 73's Peter = PA1SDB
 
www.qsl.net/pa1sdb
 
------=_NextPart_000_0CAB_01CE0133.CB05ADF0--