Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 1EBB838000097; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 04:19:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U3k6R-0007zy-0L for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:18:39 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U3k6Q-0007zp-Ir for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:18:38 +0000 Received: from rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be ([134.58.240.130] helo=cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U3k6O-0003Bk-SW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 09:18:37 +0000 X-KULeuven-Envelope-From: rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.be X-KULeuven-Scanned: Found to be clean X-KULeuven-ID: ED550128041.AD3AE X-KULeuven-Information: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Received: from icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (icts-p-smtps-1e.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.33]) by cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED550128041 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:18:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-HUB1.luna.kuleuven.be (icts-s-hub1.luna.kuleuven.be [10.112.9.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by icts-p-smtps-1.cc.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3078C404D for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:18:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::312b:f3bc:9c4:4ebb]) by ICTS-S-HUB1.luna.kuleuven.be ([fe80::f5f7:d8cc:bee0:28d3%26]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:18:04 +0100 X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Rik Strobbe To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan Thread-Index: AQHOBdaWqF01s1Wfpk+LouYMdgleophvrqbM Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 09:18:04 +0000 Message-ID: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6F68C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <33a081ba8fa54d99adcf8022fbb0c07b@kabelmail.de>,<981c2fdebe29e7ff448a2bfb7bf53238@sensemail.ch> In-Reply-To: <981c2fdebe29e7ff448a2bfb7bf53238@sensemail.ch> Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US Content-Language: nl-BE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.112.13.12] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 134.58.240.130 (rhcavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be) used invalid HELO/EHLO cavuit02.kulnet.kuleuven.be - verification failed X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Tony, is this a proposal for the interim meeting of the C4 (HF) commitee in Vienna? I think it is far too early for a bandplan. A case of chronical regulatitis? 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [134.58.240.130 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: a6b6ffaf48fdddf1ed5c25dc4bf03ee1 Subject: LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da6075114c32c30f2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Tony, =20 is this a proposal for the interim meeting of the C4 (HF) commitee in Vienn= a? I think it is far too early for a bandplan. A case of chronical regulatitis= ? =20 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T =20 ________________________________________ Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= ] namens traumwandler@sensemail.ch [traumwandler@sensemail.ch] Verzonden: vrijdag 8 februari 2013 9:24 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Onderwerp: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan Are you aware of this proposal? What do you think about it? 73 de Toni, HB9ASB Recommendation From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time being) like to present the following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region 1 bandplan: 472 - 479 kHz (630 m) 472 - 475 kHz CW only =96 maximum bandwidth 200 Hz 472.000 - 472.150 CW Beacons only (IARU coordinated) 472.150 - 472.300 CW QRSS 472.600 CW DX Calling 474.750 CW Calling 475 - 479 kHz CW + digimodes =96 maximum bandwidth 500 Hz Contests should be discouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where radio amateurs are secondary users. Comment: NRRL feels that it will be premature to further subdivide different digimodes. This may be better to do at the next conference, if necessary, after considering experiences.=