Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8ACC4380000BA; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 05:28:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U3lB8-0008I4-Da for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:27:34 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U3lB8-0008Hv-0B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:27:34 +0000 Received: from mail.senselan.ch ([194.153.189.2]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U3lB6-0003T8-7H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 10:27:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 29155 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2013 10:27:11 -0000 Received: from webmail.senselan.ch (traumwandler@sensemail.ch@194.153.189.10) by mail.senselan.ch with ESMTPA; 8 Feb 2013 10:27:11 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:27:10 +0100 From: traumwandler@sensemail.ch To: In-Reply-To: <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6F68C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> References: <33a081ba8fa54d99adcf8022fbb0c07b@kabelmail.de>,<981c2fdebe29e7ff448a2bfb7bf53238@sensemail.ch> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A0FB6F68C@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> Message-ID: <758423333dffd78d1eef9daddad3904a@sensemail.ch> X-Sender: traumwandler@sensemail.ch User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.8.1 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Rik Yes it is. But it is not the only strange proposal for this meeting. The DARC would like to establish HF-Links for VHF/UHF Repeaters! 73 de Toni [...] Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [194.153.189.2 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Scan-Signature: 1c38f63d01970a2bf149f660c9cb2a37 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: LF: RE: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad35114d357530e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Rik Yes it is. But it is not the only strange proposal for this meeting. The DARC would like to establish HF-Links for VHF/UHF Repeaters! 73 de Toni Am 08.02.2013 10:18, schrieb Rik Strobbe: > Hi Tony, > > is this a proposal for the interim meeting of the C4 (HF) commitee in > Vienna? > I think it is far too early for a bandplan. A case of chronical > regulatitis? > > 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T > > ________________________________________ > Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] namens traumwandler@sensemail.ch > [traumwandler@sensemail.ch] > Verzonden: vrijdag 8 februari 2013 9:24 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Onderwerp: LF: NRRL proposal for a 630m Band Plan > > Are you aware of this proposal? > What do you think about it? > 73 de Toni, HB9ASB > > > Recommendation > From the viewpoints of NRRL we would (at the time being) like to > present the > following proposal for a 630 m IARU Region 1 bandplan: > 472 - 479 kHz (630 m) > 472 - 475 kHz CW only – maximum bandwidth 200 Hz > 472.000 - 472.150 CW Beacons only (IARU coordinated) > 472.150 - 472.300 CW QRSS > 472.600 CW DX Calling > 474.750 CW Calling > 475 - 479 kHz CW + digimodes – maximum bandwidth 500 Hz > Contests should be discouraged in this very narrow 630 m band where > radio > amateurs are secondary users. > Comment: > NRRL feels that it will be premature to further subdivide different > digimodes. This > may be better to do at the next conference, if necessary, after > considering > experiences.