Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 34F40380000BF; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:47:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U8Avx-0007FT-HT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:46:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U8Avx-0007FJ-0k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:46:09 +0000 Received: from nm1.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([212.82.108.232]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U8Avu-0002GW-8V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:46:07 +0000 Received: from [212.82.108.229] by nm1.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Feb 2013 14:42:38 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.178] by tm2.bt.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Feb 2013 14:42:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp119.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 20 Feb 2013 14:42:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1361371358; bh=QQy+fcuRCgz87OzpPUpeA4cZcnNPWDk4nIa86zJEk/U=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=JxPNstgi9qBAhzrgVfH8EYMQfDg4A9JCH4rpKy+thta0sOlk3pMRh654EAMF8FJK8DxitglVA8WtfinSKh9648H1Lq55Vm6x2Ei9p+Ni/9HadqAvU10F0Ige8ngjVtVabsbQ8nQyghFqkb3dGAQJkqDmQZt9GbC0Su0CltwPQZ0= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 916895.73774.bm@smtp119.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: j7Qx8KIVM1lkZHWKCk8ajmhwg1NeLlk9xQiNkoUPQaYxTxf QYntcYkYGg0kPN5Hr.qAu9ec0_iPU0jXCXOONKba4zZo0xU5EYhNuNU1J3_f c8IcsdZu3BXcBJsHx6KOG7O8oJ0v8wFMdOB1xZGc63GzoNKyrZKPAMhVlbsP DxiSpv8C1lT66GjQZOw87jmwx0b6PGt33H3ANhFaItdOAl.kOddrLTTxdH0m 991WtnqqW3psaN1JYFWdhvlNAmymryFgkJdAVNiCrCw9pBj7uToDOaRs_z3n l_ZglM6znXLYh4is1jzyZFuLtDQNqMdMHmZ7kKo9mcgHT8uz.O7rd.uitJNX .yk.Tjr7fka6jO8bly_.3Nrb_BTrZtg6arUM25ry.w8Zv._h70WSO5v4aPON mbC2i0bD1DNl1tYXG8ZSvZHXN7R.Cn.fZcUrgCGQA_hkEzoT.15NVXh3ycyP ba6cGrjtaYS_XBLIFmKTY5pWZrQXL6AMhgo9M77JBYm3seLBhLi7rJtYPRED 1epSxMDzlmhwMDVLe8VUpvKCcsev.rw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from gnat (alan.melia@109.148.134.241 with login) by smtp119.bt.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2013 14:42:38 +0000 UTC Message-ID: <6CCB8568E37648CFB765B787E462B4DA@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <51241A3B.5020105@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <51241C8C.4030001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <001301ce0f67$423300d0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:32:22 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 130220-0, 20/02/2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jay I am still pondering this, plotting Dst against "period receive signal exceeds xdB" gives a interesting but not very illumination picture. It provides a cut off when theDstis depressed, but it shows a wide range of received signals when the Dst is high (towards zero nT). I am still looking for another factor. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [212.82.108.232 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: ac0f6ff1af52b6036ac1f4fe0c2bd52c Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.6 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mtain-de04.r1000.mx.aol.com ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cc5124e1ed0a52 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Jay I am still pondering this, plotting Dst against "period receive signal exceeds xdB" gives a interesting but not very illumination picture. It provides a cut off when theDstis depressed, but it shows a wide range of received signals when the Dst is high (towards zero nT). I am still looking for another factor. By "quiet period" I mean Kp <2 for 10 days or more.... really quiet geomagnetically and signal levels seem to be unexpectedly poor. Then signals seem to improve after a low level event say Kp=4 . That led to my idea of ionospheric "leak". However taking a quick look at the recent conditions, things look active enough to be "normal". It is very confusing but I am looking to see if it could be explained by just an unfavourable path length/fading. Unfortunately one needs several stations in different location to either tranmit, or several receiving stations to receive the same signal to see the effect of this. If some paths are unfavouable other should be favoured. One problem also is I do not know what a "subjectively" worse signal means, does it mean 10dB ?? Most likely not waterfal displays are very non-linear so it might only be a dB or two. That could easily be expained by a fading pattern involving say three different hop modes. There was a grab recently that shoed Stefan and Markus. Markus was fading to a "ragged" trace at times whereas Stefan was solid all the time, though they were probably seeing similar fading conditions. I am still not convinced that there is not some other effect but I cant find anything:-)) Bit like "Dark Propagation" :-)) Best Wishes Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Cc: ; Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 12:38 PM Subject: Re: LF: Beacon to the west > Stefan > > Good copy last night ... although some dB short of the 'best' conditions. > Seem to recall Alan mentioning that prolonged 'quiet' periods can be less > favorable than those that feature some 'ups and downs'. Maybe Alan will > chime in. > > Representative capture below. Copy past 0800Z at > http://www.w1vd.com/interestinggrab.html ... if you squint hard enough. > > Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 >